Autonomous Packing Machine Control for Track Ballast Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current track maintenance processes rely heavily on human operators for packing machines, leading to inconsistent and often damaging compression forces, which result in short-term corrections of track geometry defects but fail to address underlying ballast issues, increasing maintenance costs and reducing track durability.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an automatic and autonomous control system for track-building machines that uses sensors and machine learning to record and analyze ballast bed parameters, providing positionally accurate work instructions for packing machines to adapt their operations based on real-time data, ensuring optimal packing methods and reducing human error.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If human operators control the packing machine manually, then operational flexibility is maintained, but packing quality consistency deteriorates and ballast damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacking quality consistencyVSAvoidmanual operation requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The packing machine performs self-positioning and self-adjustment using onboard sensors (GPS, inertial measurement unit, laser scanner) to automatically determine track geometry deviations and adjust packing parameters without human intervention, thereby improving consistency while reducing manual operation requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical control with an automated control system that uses sensors, processors, and actuators to control the packing mechanism, substituting human operators with an automated system that maintains flexibility through programmable logic while ensuring consistent packing quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If high compression forces are applied during packing, then track geometry correction is improved, but ballast durability deteriorates due to damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrack geometry correction precisionVSAvoidballast durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The packing force is made dynamic and adaptive rather than static and fixed. The system continuously measures track geometry deviations using sensors and adjusts the compression force in real-time based on the actual ballast condition and required correction, applying only the necessary force to avoid damage while achieving precise geometry correction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the packing parameters (compression force, packing depth, packing speed) based on real-time feedback from sensors that measure track geometry and ballast condition. This allows the system to optimize packing parameters for each specific location, achieving high precision correction without excessive force that would damage the ballast

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If frequent maintenance work is performed, then track geometry quality is maintained, but maintenance costs increase and track availability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrack geometry qualityVSAvoidtrack availability during maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of track geometry deviations using sensors before packing operations begin. By identifying and correcting issues early through continuous monitoring and automated packing, the system prevents minor deviations from escalating into major problems that would require frequent and extensive maintenance interventions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a closed-loop feedback system where sensors continuously measure track geometry after packing operations, and this feedback is used to adjust subsequent packing parameters. This ensures that corrections are precise and durable, reducing the need for repeat maintenance work and improving track availability between maintenance cycles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20230228042A1Method for automatic autonomous control of a packing machine
Publication Date: 2023.07.20 HP3 REAL GMBH
  • US20230228042A1 patent drawing
  • US20230228042A1 patent drawing
  • US20230228042A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for automatic autonomous control of a packing machine (C) having a position-measuring device (WMS, GPS, 32) for precise detection of the position of the track-building machine in a track, and signal detection by actuators of working assemblies (23, bv, 18, 26) of the packing machine (C). Track ballast data are detected by sensors (23, bv, 18, 26) during the packing and the current track ballast parameters are detected therefrom and stored for a subsequent work pass and analysed by a device for machine learning (17, ML). An analysis of the track ballast state data (EF7, S9, A3) is created on the basis of machine learning methods (ML, 17) and the track ballast parameters are analysed in view of a drop in compression forces that occurs in the longitudinal track direction and work instructions (EF7, S9, A3) for an optimal work approach are ascertained therefrom and stored. In a subsequent work pass, depending on the current position in the track and on the associated work instruction data, the packing machine carries out the work instructions automatically and autonomously.