Page Control Performance Testing via Multi-Dimensional FPS Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for testing page control performance in mobile devices are limited, as they often evaluate performance in a single dimension, leading to low credibility of evaluation results due to varying user operations and the importance of factors like FPS during scrolling, message opening, image cutting, and page rendering.

Innovation Solution

A comprehensive testing method that evaluates page control performance across multiple dimensions, including FPS during scrolling, message opening, image cutting, and page rendering, using a linear weighted sum to calculate a comprehensive score and determine operation performance based on preset thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single dimension test is used for page control performance evaluation, then the testing process is simple, but the credibility of evaluation results is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting process complexityVSAvoidcredibility of evaluation results
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the page control performance evaluation into multiple independent dimensions (FPS during scrolling, message opening, image cutting, page rendering). Each dimension is tested separately with specific test cases, and then aggregated to form a comprehensive evaluation. This segmentation allows thorough coverage of different operational scenarios while maintaining manageable test design for each individual dimension.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from single-dimension testing to multi-dimensional testing by introducing multiple evaluation criteria simultaneously. Instead of evaluating performance along one metric, the system evaluates across several dimensions (scrolling smoothness, message opening speed, image cutting performance, page rendering efficiency), creating a multidimensional performance space that captures the complexity of real-world usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If multiple evaluation dimensions are tested, then the credibility of evaluation results is improved, but the testing process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecredibility of evaluation resultsVSAvoidtesting process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple individual test results into a unified comprehensive evaluation through a weighted scoring system. Each dimension's test result is assigned a weight reflecting its importance, and the weighted scores are combined to produce an overall performance rating. This merging process consolidates the complexity of multiple tests into a single interpretable metric while preserving the nuanced information from each dimension.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where test results from each dimension are systematically collected, analyzed, and aggregated. The comprehensive score provides feedback on overall performance, while individual dimension scores provide targeted feedback on specific weaknesses. This multi-level feedback system helps developers understand both overall performance and specific areas needing improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11232011B2Method and apparatus for testing performance of a page control and electronic device
Publication Date: 2022.01.25 ZHUHAI JUNTIAN ELECTRONICS TECH
  • US11232011B2 patent drawing
  • US11232011B2 patent drawing
  • US11232011B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for testing performance of a page control comprising: testing each of multiple evaluation dimensions for a page control, the multiple evaluation dimensions comprising at least one of an FPS (Frames Per Second) at the time of scrolling a page, an FPS at the time of opening a message, the number of times of adding a message, an FPS at the time of cutting an image, an FPS at the time of adding a message, and the number of times of rendering a page; determining a test result of each of the evaluation dimensions; determining operation performance of the page control according to the test result of each of the evaluation dimensions. Also disclosed is an apparatus for testing performance of a page control, and an electronic device. Operation performance of the page control can be tested in multiple aspects and the credibility of performance evaluation results is improved.