Pain-Affect Dataset Merging for Neural Network Pain Recognition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automated pain assessment methods are limited in real-world settings as they only compare pain to a neutral state, failing to account for multiple affect states experienced by patients, such as anxiety, depression, and comfort, which are common in clinical settings.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that incorporates affect states into pain assessment using a new pain-affect dataset, merging pain and affect datasets to train a neural network model for identifying pain levels, which includes image data and biopotential signals from patients, allowing for robust pain assessment in real-world settings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing pain assessment models trained only on pain and neutral states are used, then standardized assessment and continuous monitoring are provided, but the models fail to accurately assess pain in real-world settings where patients experience multiple affect states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepain assessment accuracyVSAvoidapplicability to multiple affect states
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the pain dataset and affect dataset into a unified pain-affect dataset, combining multiple modalities (image data, EDA, ECG, EMG) to train a single neural network model that can simultaneously assess both pain levels and affect states, thereby improving reliability across diverse clinical scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The model transitions from a static classification approach (pain vs. neutral) to a dynamic multi-state classification system that can adapt to and distinguish between multiple affect states (anxiety, depression, comfort, etc.) in real-time, enhancing both accuracy and adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of manufacture

If pain assessment models are trained only on pain and neutral states, then the assessment is simplified and standardized, but it cannot account for affect states such as anxiety, depression, and comfort that patients experience in clinical settings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel training simplicityVSAvoidaffect state information
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the training process into distinct phases: first training on the pain dataset, then training on the affect dataset, and finally merging them into a unified model. This segmented approach maintains training organization and simplicity while ensuring comprehensive coverage of both pain and affect states

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite dataset structure that integrates multiple data types (image, EDA, ECG, EMG) from both pain and affect studies, forming a rich multi-modal pain-affect dataset that preserves diverse information while maintaining a unified training framework

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS20230363703A1System and method including affect in pain level recognition
Publication Date: 2023.11.16 UNIV OF SOUTH FLORIDA
  • US20230363703A1 patent drawing
  • US20230363703A1 patent drawing
  • US20230363703A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for pain level recognition using an automated approach which incorporates a pain-affect dataset comprising bioVid pain and bioVid emotion datasets for the assessment of patient pain in clinical settings where patients often experience other affect states, such as anger and anxiety, in addition to pain.