Predictive Pain Analysis for Rheumatic Disorder Intervention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting, diagnosing, and monitoring rheumatic and musculoskeletal disorders are inadequate, leading to delayed diagnoses and suboptimal treatment, as patients often tolerate chronic pain for too long before seeking medical help, contributing to rapid disease progression.

Innovation Solution

A method that analyzes communication and activity data from mobile devices, combined with symptom-assessment surveys, to model pain-related states and provide timely interventions, optimizing treatment outcomes by identifying critical points for intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If current standards of detection and diagnosis are used, then medical care can be provided, but diagnosis is delayed and disease progression is accelerated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime to diagnosisVSAvoiddisease progression control
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection and monitoring of pain-related states before critical disease progression occurs. By continuously analyzing patient data and identifying early warning signs, the system enables intervention at optimal time points, preventing delayed diagnosis and accelerated disease progression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops by monitoring patient responses to treatments and adjusting care plans in real-time. This feedback mechanism ensures timely detection of disease progression changes and enables dynamic optimization of treatment strategies, improving both diagnostic timing and disease control reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If patients tolerate chronic pain for extended periods, then they maintain normal functioning, but disease progression accelerates unnecessarily

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient functioningVSAvoiddisease progression control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system empowers patients to actively participate in their own care by providing them with tools to report symptoms, track their condition, and receive personalized recommendations. This self-service approach maintains patient autonomy and normal functioning while ensuring timely detection of disease progression through continuous self-monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides continuous feedback to patients about their pain-related states and disease progression risks, enabling them to make informed decisions about seeking care. This feedback loop breaks the cycle of tolerating pain too long by alerting patients and providers when intervention is needed, optimizing the balance between maintaining functioning and controlling disease progression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive data collection methods are used, then accurate pain-related state modeling is achieved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepain-related state detection accuracyVSAvoiddata collection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a unified data collection framework that handles multiple data types (patient reports, sensor data, clinical measurements) through a single integrated platform. This multi-functional approach achieves comprehensive and accurate pain-related state modeling without proportionally increasing system complexity, as the same infrastructure processes diverse data sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary processing layers that translate complex multi-source data into standardized pain-related state metrics. These intermediaries simplify data integration by converting heterogeneous inputs into unified representations, achieving high measurement precision while managing system complexity through abstraction and standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10102341B2Method for managing patient quality of life
Publication Date: 2018.10.16 ORANGEDOT INC
  • US10102341B2 patent drawing
  • US10102341B2 patent drawing
  • US10102341B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for modeling behavior and pain-related state of an individual, the method comprising: receiving a log of use dataset associated with communication behavior of the individual during a time period; receiving a supplementary dataset characterizing activity of the individual during the time period; receiving a survey dataset including responses, to at least one of a set of symptom-assessment surveys, associated with a set of time points of the time period; generating a predictive analysis of a pain-related state of the individual associated with at least a portion of the time period, from at least one of the log of use dataset, the supplementary dataset, and the survey dataset; and generating an alert upon detection that a set of parameters from the predictive analysis of the pain-related state satisfy a threshold condition.