Paired Approach Feasibility Analysis for Runway Throughput

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) and marginal visual conditions, aircraft experience reduced runway throughput due to large separations maintained during landing, and pilots lack timely information about paired approach feasibility and spacing requirements, leading to rushed approach preparations.

Innovation Solution

A processor-implemented method and system for an aircraft to receive and process weather and traffic data to identify feasible target traffic for paired approaches, generating trajectories, estimating arrival times and spacing intervals, and presenting this information on a display unit to enable pilots to optimize approach planning and negotiation with air traffic control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If paired approach procedure is implemented to improve runway throughput, then productivity increases, but pilots lack timely information about feasibility and spacing requirements causing rushed approach preparation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverunway throughputVSAvoidapproach preparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of paired approach feasibility by automatically identifying compatible aircraft pairs, calculating spacing requirements, and determining feasibility metrics before the trailing aircraft reaches the FAF. This advance preparation provides pilots with sufficient time to plan their approach without rushing, while still achieving improved runway throughput through coordinated paired approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If ATC determines suitable aircraft pairs for paired approach, then paired approach capability is achieved, but aircraft are not aware of leading aircraft until late notification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepaired approach capabilityVSAvoidinformation about leading aircraft
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring traffic data and aircraft states, then providing real-time information to pilots about compatible leading aircraft, spacing requirements, and feasibility metrics. This feedback loop ensures pilots are aware of paired approach opportunities well in advance, enabling informed decision-making while maintaining the flexibility to adapt to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If pilots negotiate paired approach with ATC without advance information, then paired approach can be executed, but pilots are rushed in approach preparation during critical phase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapproach executionVSAvoidpreparation time during critical phase
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs all necessary calculations for paired approach feasibility, including spacing requirements and compatibility assessment, before the aircraft enters the critical approach phase. This preliminary action provides pilots with complete information needed for negotiation with ATC, eliminating the need for rushed decisions during the critical phase while maintaining ease of execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If IFR conditions require large separations between aircraft, then safety is maintained, but runway throughput drops significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidrunway throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts separation parameters for paired approaches by calculating precise spacing intervals based on aircraft performance, weather conditions, and trajectory data. This parameter optimization maintains safety standards while reducing excessive separations, thereby increasing runway throughput in IFR conditions without compromising reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11783717B2Systems and methods for identifying a number of feasible target traffic for a paired approach
Publication Date: 2023.10.10 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US11783717B2 patent drawing
  • US11783717B2 patent drawing
  • US11783717B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for an aircraft entering a terminal radar approach control (TRACON) airspace to identify a number of feasible target traffic for a paired approach for the aircraft. Traffic data is filtered to identify a plurality of neighbor traffic that are entering the TRACON airspace or within the TRACON airspace when the aircraft is entering the TRACON airspace and estimating, concurrently, for each neighbor traffic of the plurality of neighbor traffic: a trajectory, a traffic arrival time at an ideal location for a respective paired approach with the aircraft, a spacing interval between the neighbor traffic and the aircraft for the respective paired approach, and a respective target location for the aircraft to begin the respective paired approach, as a function of the spacing interval. Based on the estimations, the method identifies feasible, marginally feasible, and infeasible targets, and displays this information in an intuitive lateral display.