Progressive Addition Lens Astigmatism Vector Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional progressive addition lenses (PALs) fail to consider the adverse impact of rapidly changing oblique astigmatism on visual comfort and vision zone width, leading to discomfort and reduced functional viewing zones.

Innovation Solution

Designing PALs with vision zones that include controlled levels of astigmatism and optimizing the astigmatism vector orientation, rather than just magnitude, to reduce the gradient of astigmatism and enhance depth of focus, thereby increasing functional zone widths and comfort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional PALs are designed to be substantially free of astigmatism in vision zones, then manufacturing precision and optical quality are improved, but visual comfort and functional viewing zone width deteriorate due to rapidly changing oblique astigmatism at zone boundaries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveastigmatism control in vision zonesVSAvoidvisual comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the astigmatism parameter from being strictly controlled to a controlled variable. Specifically, it allows astigmatism to vary progressively across the lens surface, transitioning from minimal astigmatism in the distance vision zone to controlled astigmatism in the intermediate and near vision zones. This parameter change resolves the contradiction by accepting that some astigmatism is necessary for visual comfort while still maintaining optical quality through controlled variation rather than complete absence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic variation in astigmatism across different regions of the lens. Rather than a static, uniform astigmatism distribution, the design creates a dynamic pattern where astigmatism magnitude and orientation change progressively from the distance vision zone through the intermediate zone to the near vision zone. This dynamic approach allows the lens to adapt to different viewing distances and conditions, improving visual comfort while maintaining manufacturing precision through planned variation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If vision zones are made wider to increase functional viewing area, then productivity and ease of operation are improved, but astigmatism buildup at zone boundaries increases causing discomfort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional viewing zone widthVSAvoidastigmatism buildup at zone boundaries
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-planning and pre-controlling astigmatism distribution across the lens surface during the design phase. Instead of allowing astigmatism to build up uncontrollably at zone boundaries after the lens is manufactured, the design proactively creates a gradual transition zone that anticipates and prevents harmful astigmatism buildup. This is achieved by incorporating controlled astigmatism variation into the lens profile before manufacturing, thereby enabling wider functional viewing zones without discomfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating different astigmatism characteristics in different regions of the lens. The distance vision zone has minimal astigmatism, while the intermediate and near vision zones have progressively increased but controlled astigmatism. This local differentiation allows each zone to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining overall comfort. The controlled variation in local astigmatism properties enables wider functional zones without creating abrupt transitions that would cause discomfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If astigmatism is controlled to improve visual comfort, then ease of operation is improved, but the complexity of lens design and manufacturing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual comfortVSAvoidlens design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent manages design complexity by focusing on controlled parameter changes rather than complex structural modifications. Instead of creating multiple lens elements or complex surface geometries, the solution achieves visual comfort through controlled variation in astigmatism parameters across the lens surface. This approach simplifies the overall design while maintaining comfort, as it relies on gradual parameter transitions rather than complex structural features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent handles design complexity through dynamic astigmatism variation rather than static complex structures. By creating a dynamic pattern of astigmatism that changes progressively across the lens, the design achieves comfort without requiring complex manufacturing processes. The dynamic variation is implemented through controlled surface profile changes that can be manufactured using standard progressive lens techniques, thereby managing complexity while improving comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9122077B2Progressive addition lens design
Publication Date: 2015.09.01 CARL ZEISS VISION INTERNATIONAL GMBH
  • US9122077B2 patent drawing
  • US9122077B2 patent drawing
  • US9122077B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the present invention provide progressive addition lenses (PALs) and techniques for designing PALs that result in improved visual performance for the wearer. PALs of the present invention can have vision zones with widths that are more in line with the actual or functional sizes used by wearers. PALs of the present invention can also introduce controlled amounts of unwanted astigmatism into one or more vision zones. By allowing vision zones to include manageable levels of astigmatism, the resulting PAL can avoid the harsh build-up of astigmatism typically found in conventional PALs at the periphery of the channel and viewing zones. Further, PALs of the present invention can be designed using a merit function to achieve an optimized iterative design that accounts for astigmatism vector orientation and not simply astigmatism magnitude as is the case with conventional PAL design.