Wooden Pallet Mark Detection for ISPM15 Readability Inspection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need to automate the detection of International Standards For Phytosanitary Measures (ISPM15) markings on wooden pallets to ensure compliance with heat treatment requirements, as non-compliance can lead to shipment rejections and associated costs.

Innovation Solution

A pallet inspection system with cameras and processors that perform object detection, image segmentation, and optical character recognition to identify and verify the presence and readability of ISPM15 markings on wooden pallets, ensuring compliance through machine learning algorithms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated detection systems are implemented to identify ISPM15 markings, then inspection efficiency and accuracy are improved, but system complexity and initial costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection system segments the pallet surface into multiple regions of interest and processes each region independently using distributed camera units. This divides the complex inspection task into manageable segments, improving processing efficiency while maintaining system manageability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual visual inspection with automated optical detection using cameras and machine learning algorithms. This substitution of mechanical/optical systems for human inspection significantly improves productivity while the modular software architecture keeps complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If multiple cameras and processing algorithms are used to ensure accurate detection of markings, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs machine learning algorithms that learn from training data and provide feedback on detection confidence levels. This feedback mechanism allows the system to adjust processing intensity dynamically, maintaining high detection accuracy while optimizing computational resource usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary processing steps such as image preprocessing, feature extraction, and candidate marking before final detection. This staged approach breaks down complex detection tasks into simpler sequential operations, improving accuracy while managing processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If comprehensive image processing and validation are performed to verify heat treatment compliance, then reliability is improved, but loss of time in processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance verification reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial validation by focusing processing on regions containing markings rather than analyzing the entire pallet surface. This selective approach maintains high reliability for compliance verification while significantly reducing overall processing time through targeted analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements multi-stage processing where high-confidence detections are validated quickly while low-confidence cases receive more thorough analysis. This allows the system to rush through obvious cases and spend more time only on ambiguous situations, optimizing the balance between reliability and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Data Source

PatentUS20260004415A1Detection of heat treated markings on a wooden pallet
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 CHEP TECH PTY LTD
  • US20260004415A1 patent drawing
  • US20260004415A1 patent drawing
  • US20260004415A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A pallet inspection system includes a frame configured to have a pallet receiving area to receive a wooden pallet to be inspected for having at least one mark indicating that wood in the pallet has been heat treated. Cameras are carried by the frame to generate images of the wooden pallet in response to the wooden pallet being in the pallet receiving area. A processor is to perform object detection on each image to detect if the mark is present, crop each image having the mark so that an area surrounding the mark within the image is removed, and perform image segmentation on each cropped image so that pixels within the cropped image are classified into regions. The processor determines readability of the regions in each cropped image based on respective readability criteria thresholds, with mark classifications being based thereon.