Palm Rest Touch Function Row With Force-Based Palm Rejection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Portable information handling systems face inefficiencies in input interactions due to reduced key size and vertical travel, requiring users to hunt and peck for function keys, and palm rests occupying space while touchpads struggle with accurate touch rejection.

Innovation Solution

A palm rest with a touch detection surface and force detection sensor distinguishes intended inputs from unintended by comparing touch areas and forces, allowing function key interactions through a touch function row on-screen-display, enhancing input accuracy and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If mechanical keys with vertical travel are used in portable information handling systems, then user feedback and typing speed are improved, but device size and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetyping speed and user feedbackVSAvoiddevice weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the function row keys with the palm rest surface, merging two previously separate components (function keys and palm rest) into a single integrated structure. This eliminates the need for separate mechanical keys while maintaining input functionality through touch detection on the palm rest surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical keys with a touch detection system that uses electrical or capacitive sensing instead of mechanical movement. The palm rest surface incorporates touch detection capabilities to recognize function key inputs without requiring physical key travel or mechanical feedback mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Area of stationary object

If function keys are made smaller to reduce keyboard size, then device compactness is improved, but key identification difficulty and input accuracy worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekeyboard areaVSAvoidkey identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional mechanical key surfaces to a three-dimensional touch detection field across the palm rest surface. This allows for larger, more easily identifiable key areas while maintaining precise touch detection through multi-point touch capability and touch location analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The touch detection system provides immediate visual feedback on the display screen showing which function key area is being touched, enhancing key identification accuracy. The system can detect and report touch location, touch area, and touch pressure to confirm accurate key selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If palm rest occupies space for user comfort, then ease of operation is improved, but available space for touchpad and other inputs is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepalm support comfortVSAvoidavailable input area
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the palm rest surface multi-functional by integrating touch detection capability into it. The palm rest now serves both as a comfort surface for palm support and as an input device for function key operations, eliminating the need for separate dedicated key areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the palm rest and function key input areas into a single integrated component. The palm rest surface itself becomes the input surface for function keys, combining two previously separate functions into one unified structure that saves space while maintaining both comfort and input capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Area of stationary object

If touchpad is used for mouse operations, then device compactness is improved, but accurate touch rejection becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice footprintVSAvoidtouch rejection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different touch detection characteristics to different areas of the palm rest surface. Specific regions are configured with different sensitivity levels or detection thresholds to distinguish between intentional function key touches and unintentional palm touches, enabling accurate touch rejection while maintaining compact design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides confident and efficient input interactions by accurately rejecting unintended touches and enabling function key inputs without diverting gaze from the display, improving user experience and system performance.

Implementation Method 1

A palm rest with a touch detection surface and force detection sensor distinguishes intended inputs from unintended by comparing touch areas and forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce detection:

Data Source

PatentUS12602156B2Information handling system touch detection palm rest to support touch function row
Publication Date: 2026.04.14 DELL PROD LP
  • US12602156B2 patent drawing
  • US12602156B2 patent drawing
  • US12602156B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A portable information handling system palm rest adjacent a mechanical keyboard includes a touch detection surface to accept end user touches as inputs to the information handling system and a force detection sensor to detect pressure associated with the touches. A touch row function defined in an upper strip of the touch detection surface interacts with function key value icons presented at a main display to accept function key row inputs in the place of mechanical function keys of the keyboard. Logic executing on a processing resource compares touch areas with associated pressures to differentiate intentional inputs from unintentional inputs, such as a palm resting on the palm rest.