Automated Panel Forming Station with Trimless End Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for forming insulated panels are not fully automated, resulting in manual steps and inefficiencies in the manufacturing process.

Innovation Solution

An automated panel forming station with clamping devices, cutting mechanisms, and forming devices, controlled by a controller, which enables the formation of trimless ends on insulated panels, eliminating manual intervention and optimizing the production process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If manual steps are used in panel forming, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but productivity and automation level are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidforming process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The panel forming process is divided into distinct automated stages: clamping, cutting, forming, and ejecting. Each stage is handled by specialized automated devices working in sequence, allowing the complex forming process to be broken down into manageable automated steps that can be controlled independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The forming devices are made movable and adjustable rather than fixed. The cutting device, forming device, and clamping mechanisms can move along the panel length and adjust their positions dynamically, enabling automated adaptation to different panel sizes and forming requirements without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If manual operations are used for panel formation, then device complexity is kept low, but productivity and manufacturing speed are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepanel formation speedVSAvoidforming station complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple functions (clamping, cutting, forming, and ejecting) are combined into a single integrated automated forming station. This consolidation allows all operations to be performed in one location without manual transfer between devices, significantly increasing productivity while the functions work together as a coordinated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The automated forming station operates continuously with panels moving through the clamping, cutting, and forming stages without interruption. The conveyor system maintains continuous motion, and each automated device operates in seamless sequence, eliminating idle time and manual operation gaps to maximize productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Manufacturing precision

If automated processes are implemented, then productivity and consistency are improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrimless end precisionVSAvoidcontrolling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller receives feedback from sensors and position indicators to monitor the location and state of panels throughout the forming process. This feedback allows the controller to adjust cutting positions, forming depths, and clamping forces in real-time, ensuring precise trimless ends are achieved consistently across all panels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Manual measurement and adjustment mechanisms are replaced with automated positioning systems controlled by a controller. The controller coordinates the movement and operation of cutting and forming devices with precision, replacing manual mechanical adjustments with automated control that maintains high manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If fully automated panel forming is implemented, then labor requirements are reduced, but initial device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidforming assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated forming station is designed with universal devices that can handle multiple operations. The same clamping devices, cutting devices, and forming devices are used for different panel types and sizes, reducing the need for multiple specialized machines and lowering overall system complexity while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10882202B2Panel forming assembly
Publication Date: 2021.01.05 KINGSPAN INSULATED PANELS
  • US10882202B2 patent drawing
  • US10882202B2 patent drawing
  • US10882202B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A panel forming station has a frame, a pair of clamping devices and a pair of end forming devices. A panel is clamped between one clamping device and the frame. The first forming device forms a first trimless end on the panel. The first forming device has a cutter bending blade and a roller that forms the first trimless end. The second clamping device clamps a panel. The second forming device has a cutter, a bending blade and a roller to form the second trimless end. A controller couples with the first and second clamping device and first and second end forming devices to control the panel's passage through the frame.