Panel Radiation Detector Using SiPM Edge Sensors and 1-Bit Digitization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional radiation detectors using plastic scintillators face challenges in sensitivity, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness, particularly in spectroscopic measurements due to poor energy resolution and high cost, compared to crystal scintillators.

Innovation Solution

A panel radiation detector design featuring a plurality of adjoining plastic scintillator slabs with silicon photomultiplier sensors arranged at their edges, combined with signal processing units that perform 1-bit digitization of detection signals to determine radiation event energy, allowing for improved sensitivity, spatial resolution, and cost-effectiveness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If plastic scintillators are used for radiation detection, then cost-effectiveness is improved, but energy resolution deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost-effectivenessVSAvoidenergy resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The scintillator is divided into multiple slabs with SiPM sensors positioned at the edges of each slab. This segmentation allows for improved light collection efficiency by placing sensors closer to the scintillation events, thereby improving energy resolution while maintaining the cost-effectiveness of plastic scintillators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of placing SiPM sensors on the broad surfaces of the scintillator, the invention positions them at the edges (one-dimensional positioning). This edge positioning strategy optimizes the geometric relationship between scintillation light production and sensor detection, improving light collection efficiency and energy resolution without increasing material costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If conventional photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) are used for light readout, then detection capability is maintained, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces expensive, fragile PMTs with cheaper, more robust SiPM sensors. SiPMs are solid-state devices that are mechanically stronger, consume less power, and do not require high voltage supplies or light guides, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention substitutes the vacuum tube-based PMT system with solid-state SiPM sensors. This replacement eliminates the need for complex mechanical components such as light guides and high voltage supplies, reducing overall device complexity while preserving radiation detection functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If full digitization is performed for signal processing, then measurement precision is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy determination precisionVSAvoiduse of energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the parameter of digitization from full-resolution analog-to-digital conversion to 1-bit digitization. This parameter change significantly reduces the energy consumption of the digitization circuit while still enabling accurate energy determination through pulse width analysis, as the pulse width contains sufficient information about the scintillation light intensity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enhances detection sensitivity and efficiency while reducing costs, enabling spectroscopic capabilities that were previously unattainable with common plastic scintillator detectors, by leveraging improved light collection and simplified signal processing through pulse width analysis.

Implementation Method 1

The detection is performed by measuring the scintillation light generated when radiation interacts with the scintillating material of the scintillator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScintillation: Scintillation

Implementation Method 2

A SiPM comprises a dense array of single-photon avalanche diode (SPAD) sensors operating in Geiger mode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric Effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS11971511B2Panel radiation detector comprising a plurality of adjoining plastic scintillator slabs and a plurality of silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) sensors
Publication Date: 2024.04.30 ARKTIS RADIATION DETECTORS
  • US11971511B2 patent drawing
  • US11971511B2 patent drawing
  • US11971511B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A panel radiation detector is provided for detecting radiation event(s) of ionizing radiation, comprising a plurality of adjoining plastic scintillator slabs, a plurality of silicon photomultiplier sensors arranged at an edge of at least one of the plastic scintillator slabs) and configured to detect scintillation light generated in the scintillator slabs responsive to the radiation events, and a plurality of signal processing units each connected to one of the silicon photomultiplier sensors, wherein the signal processing units each comprise a digitization circuit configured to generate a digitized signal for signal analysis by executing 1-bit digitization of a detection signal generated by at least one of the silicon photomultiplier sensors responsive to the detected scintillation light for determining the energy of the detected radiation event(s).