Panel Saw Hazard Detection With Multi-Sensor Blade Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sliding table saw safety devices are ineffective in preventing injuries due to high false triggering rates, limited ergonomic design, and inability to handle unexpected hazardous situations quickly, leading to user dissatisfaction and non-implementation in machine tools.

Innovation Solution

A sliding table saw with a multidimensional detection system using video cameras, thermal imaging, and capacitive sensors to assess the distance, speed, and acceleration of human body parts relative to the circular saw blade, coupled with a safety device that initiates appropriate safety measures such as reducing blade speed or deploying a defusing element to mitigate risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a safety device with simple detection mechanism is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the measurement precision and reliability of hazard detection deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety device structureVSAvoidhazard detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple independent detection systems (video camera system, thermal imaging system, capacitive sensor system) into a unified safety device. Each system detects different aspects of hazardous situations, and their results are merged to achieve comprehensive and accurate hazard detection, resolving the contradiction between simple structure and high detection precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The safety device performs multiple detection functions simultaneously: visual detection of body parts, thermal detection of skin temperature, and capacitive detection of proximity. This multi-functional approach enables the device to accurately identify various hazardous situations without requiring separate specialized devices for each detection type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If a safety device with fast response time is implemented, then the reliability of injury prevention is improved, but the device complexity and cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinjury prevention effectivenessVSAvoiddetection and response system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety device continuously monitors the workspace before hazardous situations occur, maintaining readiness to activate safety measures. The system pre-positions the circular saw blade in a retracted position and keeps safety protocols prepared, enabling immediate response when hazards are detected, thus achieving high reliability without requiring overly complex real-time intervention mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where detection results immediately trigger appropriate safety responses. The video camera, thermal imaging, and capacitive sensors provide real-time feedback on body part positions and temperatures, which automatically control the circular saw blade's movement and speed, creating a reliable closed-loop safety system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If multiple detection systems are integrated, then the measurement precision and hazard detection capability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is divided into three independent but coordinated segments: video camera system for visual detection, thermal imaging system for temperature detection, and capacitive sensor system for proximity detection. Each segment operates independently with its own processing logic, then their results are combined to achieve comprehensive hazard detection, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If safety measures are automatically initiated, then the reliability of protection is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates due to reduced user control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety measure executionVSAvoiduser control over saw
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The safety system dynamically adjusts the level of automation based on the detected hazard level. For minor hazards, the system provides warnings and allows continued operation with user control. For serious hazards, the system automatically initiates safety measures such as retracting the blade. This dynamic approach maintains ease of operation for normal use while ensuring reliable protection when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces the risk of injury by accurately detecting hazardous situations and initiating timely safety measures, enhancing user safety and reducing the likelihood of false triggers, thus improving user acceptance and operational efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

a video camera to detect a position, a speed and an acceleration of a human body part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVisual detection:

Implementation Method 2

a thermal imaging camera to detect a temperature of a human body part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal radiation detection: Thermal Radiation

Implementation Method 3

a capacitive sensor to detect contact or a proximity of a human body part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance detection: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentEP3403790B1Safety device for a formatting circular saw and method of using a formatting circular saw
Publication Date: 2023.06.07 ALTENDORF GMBH
  • EP3403790B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3403790B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3403790B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a panel saw, in particular for processing wood and/or plastic materials, and a computer-implemented method for controlling and/or regulating a panel saw.In particular, the invention relates to a panel saw, especially for processing wood and/or plastic materials, comprising a workpiece support surface with a saw slot, a saw unit with a circular saw blade having a plurality of saw teeth for processing workpieces, wherein the circular saw blade is rotatably mounted on the saw unit below the workpiece support surface and projects through the saw slot in a sawing operating mode, a detection device for recognizing at least one hazardous condition for a human body part caused by the saw blade, a safety device for preventing injuries to a human body part caused by the circular saw blade by means of a safety measure, and a control device.