Automatic X-ray Exposure Adjustment in Panoramic Radiography

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current dental panoramic radiographic apparatuses require manual adjustment of X-ray exposure parameters by operators, which can lead to over or underexposure, increased patient dose, and longer acquisition times due to the need for scout images and complex feedback control mechanisms, failing to account for patient-specific anatomical variations.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that perform a pre-acquisition scout with a small, defined anatomic portion to compute optimal exposure parameters using a simple algorithm, correlating attenuation measures directly to image exposure without additional hardware or operator intervention, ensuring consistent exposure and minimizing patient dose.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual adjustment of X-ray exposure parameters is performed by operators, then exposure can be customized, but it leads to over or underexposure, increased patient dose, and longer acquisition times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual adjustment capabilityVSAvoidexposure accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic exposure parameter adjustment based on patient-specific anatomical variations detected during the scan, eliminating the need for manual operator intervention. The apparatus autonomously computes optimal exposure parameters (kV, mA, duration) by analyzing real-time attenuation measurements and patient geometry, thereby resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and exposure accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where attenuation measurements taken during the scan are continuously used to adjust exposure parameters. The apparatus measures X-ray attenuation through different patient tissues and uses this information to dynamically optimize exposure settings, ensuring accurate exposure while reducing patient dose and acquisition time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If scout images are acquired to determine exposure parameters, then patient-specific exposure can be calculated, but it increases overall acquisition time and patient motion risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient-specific exposure measurementVSAvoidacquisition time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the scout image acquisition and the main diagnostic image acquisition into a single continuous scan process. The same X-ray beam and detector are used for both purposes, with exposure parameters being optimized in real-time during the scan based on measured attenuation. This eliminates the need for separate scout images, thereby reducing acquisition time and patient motion risk while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary measurement of patient anatomy and attenuation characteristics during the initial phase of the scan, then uses this information to pre-calculate and apply optimal exposure parameters for the remainder of the acquisition. This preliminary action enables patient-specific exposure optimization without requiring separate scout images, thus reducing total acquisition time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If complex feedback control mechanisms are implemented for real-time parameter adjustment, then exposure accuracy improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexposure accuracyVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex mechanical feedback control mechanisms with a computational approach. Instead of using complex hardware-based real-time adjustment systems, the apparatus uses software algorithms to calculate optimal exposure parameters based on measured attenuation data and patient geometry. This substitution of mechanical complexity with computational simplicity maintains exposure accuracy while reducing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system optimizes exposure parameters (kV, mA, duration) by changing them in discrete steps based on measured attenuation values and patient-specific factors. Rather than implementing continuous complex feedback control, the system adjusts parameters in optimized increments, achieving accurate exposure with simpler control logic and reduced device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If standard exposure parameters are used for all patients, then acquisition time is reduced, but patient dose increases due to overexposure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacquisition speedVSAvoidpatient radiation dose
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality optimization by determining exposure parameters specific to each patient's anatomy and tissue composition. Instead of using uniform standard parameters for all patients, the apparatus measures attenuation characteristics for each individual and calculates customized exposure settings. This enables rapid acquisition while minimizing patient dose by avoiding overexposure, thus resolving the contradiction between productivity and radiation safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the overall time for panoramic image acquisition, minimizes patient motion, and tailors the X-ray dose to the individual patient, providing diagnostically valid images with reduced operator involvement and minimal additional X-ray exposure.

Implementation Method 1

The X-ray bundle undergoes attenuation while passing through different tissues of the patient; this attenuation determines the degree of exposure of a radiographic image. Different tissues attenuate X-rays in different ways according to their density

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray attenuation: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentUS10743825B2Method and apparatus for adjusting technical exposure factors during radiographic acquisition
Publication Date: 2020.08.18 CEFLA SOC COOP
  • US10743825B2 patent drawing
  • US10743825B2 patent drawing
  • US10743825B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for acquiring a radiographic image of a patient includes using an X-ray source and at least a X-ray detector supported in opposed positions, the area under investigation being positioned between the X-ray source and detector in the propagation bundle of the radiation emitted by the X-ray source, the X-ray source and detector being movable along a pre-set trajectory due to at least two movements. The X-ray dose administered to a patient can be adjusted automatically, dispensing the minimum dose necessary to achieve a radiographic image of good quality. The method and apparatus provide for performing a scout acquisition, preceding the acquisition of a real panoramic image, in a particularly efficient way. During the scout acquisition, data are collected for adjusting the X-ray dose for the following radiographic image acquisition.