Pantograph Force Control via Bidirectional Snubber

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The replacement of electrical components, such as vacuum circuit breakers, often faces difficulties due to dynamic mismatches in pantograph coupling or engagement, leading to excessive force application on the MOC assembly, resulting in premature wear, failure, and contact bounce.

Innovation Solution

A bidirectional snubber member coupled to a shaft within the circuit breaker mechanism opposes the applied force by compressing and uncoiling a spring, while a velocity controller further dampens the force through rotational linkages, ensuring controlled force application to the pantograph.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a new MOC operator is installed to replace an existing one, then the electrical component can be updated or maintained, but the force applied to the MOC assembly becomes excessively high (up to 16 times the original force), causing premature wear and failure

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMOC assembly durabilityVSAvoidforce applied to MOC assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

A force limiting assembly is introduced as an intermediary component between the MOC operator and the MOC assembly. This assembly includes a force limiting mechanism that mechanically restricts the maximum force transmitted to the MOC assembly, preventing the excessive force (up to 16 times original) from reaching the contacts while still allowing the new operator to function properly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The force limiting assembly modifies the force parameter by implementing a mechanical constraint that caps the maximum force at a safe level. The mechanism changes the force transmission characteristics from uncontrolled (0-16x original force) to controlled (0-maximum safe force), thereby protecting the MOC assembly from damage while maintaining operational capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the force applied by the MOC operator is increased to ensure reliable engagement, then the contact switching reliability improves, but contact bounce increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact switching reliabilityVSAvoidcontact bounce
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The force limiting assembly applies preliminary anti-action by pre-establishing a mechanical constraint that prevents excessive force from being applied in the first place. This proactive limitation stops the condition that would lead to contact bounce before it occurs, rather than attempting to mitigate bounce after excessive force has been applied

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Reliability

If the force requirements are increased to ensure proper MOC assembly engagement, then the switching operation becomes more reliable, but the circuit breaker may stall

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching operation reliabilityVSAvoidcircuit breaker operation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The force limiting assembly serves as a mediator that decouples the relationship between operator force and MOC assembly engagement force. It allows the operator to generate sufficient force for reliable engagement while preventing force transmission that would exceed the circuit breaker's operational capacity and cause stalling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively reduces the force applied to the MOC assembly, preventing premature wear and failure, and minimizing contact bounce, thereby ensuring stable operation across various electrical switching equipment brands and types.

Implementation Method 1

The snubber opposes the applied force by compressing a spring within the snubber housing and then uncoiling the compressed spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

Rotational linkages between the shaft and the bidirectional snubber and between the bidirectional snubber and the velocity controller are used to translate the force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Data Source

PatentUS7397007B2Assembly for controlling the force applied to a pantograph
Publication Date: 2008.07.08 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC
  • US7397007B2 patent drawing
  • US7397007B2 patent drawing
  • US7397007B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for controlling a force applied to a pantograph. A bidirectional snubber and a velocity controller are used to dampen the applied force. Linkages between a shaft and the bidirectional snubber and between the bidirectional snubber and the velocity controller are used to rotationally translate the applied force.