Pantograph Fault Detection Using Impulse Response Similarity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current pantograph inspection systems fail to effectively detect internal damages, soldering joint failures, and defects in blind spots, leading to costly repairs and safety risks due to structural failures.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for pantograph fault diagnosis that involves acquiring an impulse response, extracting natural frequency and damping coefficient, and determining fault types based on similarity factors by comparing with predetermined values, using a trigger mechanism and recording equipment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual inspection methods are used to detect pantograph defects, then inspection cost is reduced, but inspection accuracy deteriorates and safety risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidinspection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary device (camera system with image processing algorithms) between the pantograph and the inspector. The camera captures images of the pantograph during operation, and image processing algorithms automatically analyze these images to detect defects such as ice accumulation, debris, or abnormal wear. This intermediary system eliminates the need for manual visual inspection while significantly improving detection accuracy and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical inspection methods with an automated optical-electronic inspection system. Instead of inspectors physically examining the pantograph, the system uses cameras to capture images and computational algorithms to analyze them, substituting human sensory and manual evaluation with automated technological means. This substitution improves precision while the automation actually reduces overall system complexity in the long term.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If real-time monitoring system is implemented, then safety reliability is improved, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepantograph safety reliabilityVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the monitoring system to perform multiple functions using a single integrated platform. The same camera system and image processing infrastructure are used to detect various types of defects including ice accumulation, debris, wear, and abnormal conditions. This multi-functional approach improves reliability across different failure modes while avoiding the need for separate specialized systems for each defect type, thereby controlling overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates automated image processing and defect recognition algorithms that enable the monitoring system to identify and flag defects without continuous human intervention. The system serves itself by automatically analyzing captured images, comparing them against known defect patterns, and generating alerts when anomalies are detected. This self-service capability improves reliability while reducing the operational complexity of manual monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If automated image processing is used, then inspection accuracy is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection precisionVSAvoidimage processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by capturing images continuously during pantograph operation rather than stopping for inspection. Images are captured in real-time as the pantograph moves through the monitoring zone, and preprocessing operations such as image enhancement, noise reduction, and feature extraction are performed automatically as images are captured. This preliminary automated processing eliminates the time loss associated with manual inspection setup and initial analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The image processing system implements a multi-level analysis approach where not all images receive full computational processing. The system first performs rapid preliminary screening to identify images containing potential defects, then applies more intensive processing only to those specific images that show anomaly indicators. This partial processing strategy maintains high detection precision for critical defects while significantly reducing overall computational time and resource requirements compared to processing every image at full detail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP3847562B1System and method for pantograph fault monitoring
Publication Date: 2026.04.22 PANTOHEALTH GMBH
  • EP3847562B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3847562B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP3847562B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

A method for monitoring a pantograph. The method includes acquiring an impulse response of the pantograph, extracting a natural frequency and a damping coefficient of the pantograph from the impulse response, obtaining a similarity factor of a plurality of similarity factors, and detecting a fault in the pantograph from the plurality of fault types based on the plurality of the similarity factors. Acquiring an impulse response of the pantograph includes generating the impulse response by tapping the head of the pantograph and recording the impulse response utilizing a recording equipment.