Automated Paper Cone Closing Machine with Tamping and Ejection Mechanisms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manually closing paper rolls with delicate materials is time-consuming and difficult, especially when they need to be packaged in standardized shapes and sizes for repurpose use.

Innovation Solution

An automated paper roll closing machine with various closing mechanisms, including tamping, flattening, and ejection systems, powered by motors and controlled through a graphical user interface, to efficiently compact and close paper rolls of conical or cylindrical shapes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual closing method is used, then flexibility in handling delicate materials is maintained, but time consumption and operational difficulty increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosing speedVSAvoidoperational difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical closing operations with an automated mechanical system comprising a closing mechanism that applies controlled force to seal packages. The system uses a processor to control the closing mechanism, substituting human manual labor with automated mechanical action, thereby increasing productivity while maintaining ease of operation through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The automated closing system performs the closing operation autonomously based on processor control, allowing the packaging machine to service itself without continuous human intervention. The system automatically detects package parameters and adjusts closing force accordingly, enabling self-adjusting operation that maintains both high productivity and operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If standardized packaging shapes are enforced, then consistency and industry standard compliance improve, but adaptability to different product requirements decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackaging consistencyVSAvoidpackaging flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The closing mechanism incorporates adjustable parameters that can be dynamically modified based on package requirements. The system can adapt closing force, speed, and mechanism positioning to match different package types while maintaining standardized output shapes. This dynamic adjustability allows the system to produce consistent standardized packaging while accommodating varying product requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as closing force, speed, and mechanism position based on detected package characteristics. By dynamically adjusting these parameters, the system maintains manufacturing precision for standardized packaging while adapting to different product requirements, thereby resolving the contradiction between consistency and flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If automated closing mechanisms are implemented, then productivity increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosing speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The closing mechanism is designed as a multi-functional system that can handle different package types and closing requirements using a single integrated mechanism. The processor-controlled system performs multiple functions including detection, adjustment, and execution of closing operations, reducing the need for multiple separate devices and thereby managing complexity while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12043440B2Automated closing systems
Publication Date: 2024.07.23 SESH TECHNOLOGIES MANUFACTURING INC
  • US12043440B2 patent drawing
  • US12043440B2 patent drawing
  • US12043440B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for an automated paper cone closing machine are disclosed. A paper cone closing machine may comprise a plurality of tamping rods, a pair of plates, and a plurality of ejection rods arranged above a tray shuttle. The plurality of tamping rods for compacting a material contained in a plurality of paper rolls removeably received in the tray shuttle in a row. The pair of plates for pressing on the top of each paper roll to flatten the top of each paper roll into a flap. The plurality of ejection rods configured to press on the flap of each paper roll to press the flap into a top of each paper roll into a dimple thereby closing each paper roll.