Paper Stationery Packaging With Lift-Up Stand for Content Visibility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing stationery packaging solutions either obstruct the visibility of contents due to their structure or require non-sustainable materials, compromising ergonomics and sustainability, while lacking interactive elements to enhance user engagement.

Innovation Solution

A paper packaging system comprising a sleeve, tray, and insert with a stand mechanism and handle that allows implements to be lifted for unobstructed viewing and easy access, made from carton material without additional materials like wood, metal, or plastics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the packaging is structured as a re-closable envelope to reduce cost, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but contents visibility is obstructed and rigidity is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidcontents visibility

Core Design Contradiction:

Ease of manufactureVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The packaging is divided into three functional segments: an outer envelope for protection and re-closability, a rigid tray for structural support and content organization, and an insert with stand mechanism for display. This segmentation allows each component to fulfill its specific function while collectively resolving the contradiction between low cost and visibility.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The rigid tray acts as an intermediary element between the soft envelope and the contents. It provides the necessary rigidity and visibility structure without requiring the entire envelope to be rigid, thus maintaining cost-effectiveness while solving the visibility and rigidity problems.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Stability of the object's composition

If space between contents is minimized to prevent wobbling, then stability is improved, but friction increases making it difficult to grab and pull out implements

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvecontent stabilityVSAvoidergonomics

Core Design Contradiction:

Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The stand mechanism is extracted as a separate functional component from the contents themselves. By providing an external lifting structure, the system stabilizes contents during storage while enabling easy extraction during use, resolving the contradiction between stability and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The stand mechanism serves as an intermediary tool between the user's hand and the contents. Instead of directly gripping tight-fitting implements, the user pulls the stand mechanism which then lifts the implements, reducing friction and improving ergonomics while maintaining content stability.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If rigid materials like wood, metal, or plastic are used to define pockets with spacing, then ergonomics are improved, but complexity and cost increase and sustainability is affected

Engineering Contradiction:

ImproveergonomicsVSAvoidpackaging complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The entire packaging system including envelope, tray, and insert is made from homogeneous paper-based materials. This eliminates the need for multiple material types (wood, metal, plastic) while maintaining structural integrity and ergonomic functionality, thus reducing complexity and improving sustainability.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #33Homogeneity

Solution Approach 2:

The packaging uses composite paper structures with varying densities and stiffness levels to achieve the functionality previously requiring rigid materials. The layered paper construction provides adequate spacing and structural support while remaining sustainable and simple in composition.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #40Composite materials

4Duration of action of stationary object

If the packaging structure is rigid enough to withstand multiple use, then durability is improved, but the packaging becomes a storage object rather than functional packaging

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvepackaging durabilityVSAvoidpackaging functionality

Core Design Contradiction:

Duration of action of stationary objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The packaging incorporates dynamic elements including the re-closable envelope flap and the collapsible stand mechanism. These dynamic features allow the packaging to transition between different functional states (open/closed, display/storage) while maintaining durability through repeated use.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The packaging is designed to perform multiple functions: protection during transport, display during selection, and storage during use. The re-closable envelope and stand mechanism enable the same structure to serve different purposes at different stages, maintaining versatility while ensuring durability.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12595092B2Stationery paper packaging

Publication Date: 2026.04.07 BIC VIOLEX SINGLE MEMBER SA

AI summary

A paper packaging for storing and presenting a plurality of longitudinal hand held implements, said packaging including: a sleeve, a tray, an insert, wherein the tray is configured to accommodate the insert, and the sleeve is configured to accommodate the tray, wherein the insert includes a stand mechanism, including a handle that protrudes from the insert and that is configured to protrude from the tray, and configured so that pulling the handle folds and raises the stand mechanism so as to lift implements arranged in the insert.