Paper-Type Detection Failure Handling in Image Forming Apparatus

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image forming apparatuses face challenges in determining paper type when the paper-type detecting device fails, leading to difficulties in setting appropriate printing conditions, and require additional storage for historical sheet usage data, increasing costs.

Innovation Solution

An image forming apparatus with a paper-type detecting unit that includes a failure determination mechanism using voltage detecting circuits to assess the paper-type detecting unit's functionality, allowing for pre-set paper types to be used during failures and user selection, eliminating the need for historical data storage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If a paper-type detecting device is used to detect paper type, then printing conditions can be automatically adjusted, but the system becomes vulnerable to detection failures and requires complex failure handling mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic paper type detectionVSAvoiddetection failure risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by storing detection results and usage histories in advance. When a detection failure occurs, the stored historical data is immediately available to determine paper type, eliminating the need for complex real-time decision-making during failure states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces an intermediary mechanism (control unit with failure determination logic) that mediates between the paper-type detecting device and the printing system. When detection fails, this intermediary uses alternative methods (usage history, manual input) to determine paper type, ensuring continuous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If historical data storage is used to determine paper type during sensor failure, then paper type can be estimated, but device complexity and cost increase due to separate storage device requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepaper type determination during failureVSAvoidstorage device requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the storage function with the existing control unit or main memory of the image forming apparatus. The storage unit that saves usage history is integrated into the apparatus's existing memory structure, eliminating the need for separate storage devices and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit performs multiple functions: it controls the paper-type detecting device, stores usage history data, determines paper type during failures, and manages printing conditions. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for dedicated separate storage hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If feature value measurement is used to determine sensor failure, then failure can be detected, but it is unclear in what state the feature value is measured making failure determination difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor failure detectionVSAvoidfailure determination clarity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors the output of the paper-type detecting device and compares it against expected ranges. When the detected feature value falls outside the predetermined range, the control unit determines sensor failure and switches to alternative determination methods, providing clear feedback about system state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit preliminarily determines whether the paper-type detecting device is in a failable state by checking if the detected feature value is within the expected range before proceeding with normal printing operations. This preliminary check provides clear failure determination criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8238771B2Image forming apparatus having paper-type detecting unit
Publication Date: 2012.08.07 KK TOSHIBA
  • US8238771B2 patent drawing
  • US8238771B2 patent drawing
  • US8238771B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image forming apparatus having a paper-type detecting unit includes a paper-type detecting unit that detects a paper type of a sheet to be printed, a fixing unit that sets fixing temperature on the basis of the paper type detected by the paper-type detecting unit and fixes a toner image on the sheet, a paper-type-detection-failure determining unit that determines that the paper-type detecting unit is in failure, a paper-type-during-failure setting unit that sets in advance a paper type having a high frequency of use as a paper type during a failure according to a region, and a printing-during-failure selecting unit which is selectably provided, when the paper-type-detection-failure determining unit determines that the paper-type detecting unit is in failure, whether a printing condition for the paper type set by the paper-type-during-failure setting unit is set or it is determined that the paper type is a paper type of a sheet printed immediately before the failure and a printing condition is continued.