Recyclable Paperboard Packaging Structure for Collectible Cards

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional blister packaging for collectible cards is resource-intensive to manufacture and environmentally unfriendly due to its petroleum-based materials, requiring multiple steps and non-biodegradable materials like PVC.

Innovation Solution

A single-piece, integrated packaging design using recyclable paper material with a unique foldable structure and adhesive system that simplifies assembly and reduces material usage, featuring tongues and fold lines for secure product containment and display.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional blister packaging with thermoformed plastic is used, then product protection and display are achieved, but manufacturing complexity and environmental harm increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct protectionVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the packaging substrate, product containment structure, and sealing mechanism into a single integrated paperboard component. The die-cut paperboard is formed with integrated flaps, pockets, and adhesive areas that combine multiple functions into one piece, eliminating the need for separate thermoformed plastic layers and reducing manufacturing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material parameter from petroleum-based thermoformed plastic to paperboard, which can be processed using different manufacturing methods. The paperboard is die-cut and folded rather than thermoformed, fundamentally changing the manufacturing process parameters while achieving similar protective functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If traditional blister packaging with PVC is used, then strength and chemical resistance are achieved, but environmental friendliness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial strengthVSAvoidenvironmental harm
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material composition parameter from PVC (polyvinyl chloride) to paperboard, fundamentally altering the material's environmental properties. The paperboard is biodegradable and recyclable, directly addressing the environmental harm caused by non-biodegradable plastics while maintaining sufficient strength for packaging applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses paperboard as a composite material that can be enhanced with coatings or treatments to achieve the necessary strength and protective properties. The die-cut design and folding structure create a composite system of paperboard layers that work together to provide protection comparable to traditional plastic packaging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Shape

If multi-step thermoforming process is used, then packaging shape and product containment are achieved, but manufacturing time and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackaging shapeVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-die-cutting the paperboard with the final packaging shape, pockets, and flap configurations before assembly. The paperboard is pre-formed with crease lines and adhesive areas during the die-cutting process, eliminating the need for time-consuming thermoforming steps and subsequent assembly operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the packaging design into distinct die-cut areas on the paperboard, including separate sections for product insertion, flap formation, and sealing. This segmentation allows each functional area to be pre-formed during die-cutting, reducing the need for additional forming steps and accelerating manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If multiple separate components are used in packaging, then product protection is enhanced, but assembly complexity and material usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct protectionVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple packaging components into a single die-cut paperboard piece. The integrated design includes the base structure, side walls, flaps, and sealing elements all formed from one continuous piece of paperboard, eliminating material waste from multiple separate components and simplifying assembly to a single folding and adhesive application process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides environmentally friendly, efficient, and secure packaging that minimizes assembly steps and equipment needs, enhancing product protection while promoting recyclability and reducing material waste.

Implementation Method 1

an adhesive is on the first tongue and adapted to couple the first panel to the second panel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS11167900B2Packaging
Publication Date: 2021.11.09 CONSOLIDATED GRAPHICS INC
  • US11167900B2 patent drawing
  • US11167900B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one aspect, a packaging comprises a substrate comprising a first panel including a first end, a second end spaced a first distance from the first end, and opposing first and second perimeter side edges extending the first distance between the first end and the second end. The entire first panel is symmetric about a first longitudinal axis thereof extending between the first end and the second end and each of the first and second perimeter side edges is disposed at first and second widths, respectively, from the first longitudinal axis at a first portion of the first panel. The first portion is disposed at least one of at the second end and proximal the second end and the first portion has a longitudinal extent along the first longitudinal axis less than the first distance. Each of the first and second perimeter side edges is disposed at third and fourth widths, respectively, from the first longitudinal axis at a second portion of the first panel spaced from the first portion wherein the first and second widths are greater than the third and fourth widths, respectively. A second panel includes a third end, a fourth end spaced from the third end, and a third portion disposed between the third end and the fourth end. The second end is coupled to the third end at a first fold line and the second panel has a length along a second longitudinal axis parallel to the first longitudinal axis greater than a width extent of the second panel perpendicular to the second longitudinal axis. A tongue extends between the third portion and the first panel and the entire first panel is substantially symmetric with respect to at least a portion of the second panel about the first fold line. Further, an adhesive is on the tongue and adapted to couple the first panel to the second panel.