Paperboard Corner Design with Overlapping Plies for Rigidity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional paperboard corners are costly due to thick, dense materials and often lack desired rigidity and resistance to tearing, leading to inconsistent physical characteristics and higher production costs.

Innovation Solution

A paperboard corner design utilizing non-corrugated plies folded into intersecting wings with overlapping sections, providing increased resistance force while using thinner materials, made from paperboards like liner or kraft cardboard, and optionally coated for structural integrity and water resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If thick and dense paperboard material is used, then resistance to tearing and structural rigidity are improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to tearingVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining multiple plies of paperboard with different properties (corrugated and non-corrugated layers) to achieve the desired strength and rigidity. This allows the corner to meet performance requirements while using thinner, less expensive materials compared to conventional single-material thick paperboard corners.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the structural parameters of the paperboard corner by introducing specific fold configurations (first fold, second fold, third fold) and overlap arrangements. These parameter changes enable the corner to achieve enhanced rigidity and tear resistance through geometric reinforcement rather than relying solely on increased material thickness, thereby reducing manufacturing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If additional plies are added to increase resistance, then structural rigidity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural rigidityVSAvoidnumber of plies
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the paperboard corner into distinct functional plies with specific roles: a first ply forming the base structure, a second ply providing reinforcement through overlapping, and a third ply offering additional protection. Each ply is folded and positioned to perform its specific function, allowing the corner to achieve high structural rigidity while maintaining manageable complexity through organized segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a nested structure where multiple plies are folded and overlapped in a compact arrangement. The plies are nested within each other through systematic folding patterns, creating a space-efficient configuration that maximizes structural rigidity within a compact form factor, thereby avoiding the need for excessive material or complex assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Ease of manufacture

If thinner plies are used, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but resistance force decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidresistance force
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes curved fold configurations and rounded corner geometries to distribute and redirect applied forces. The curved fold lines and overlapping arrangements create force distribution pathways that enhance the resistance force of thinner plies, allowing them to withstand higher loads than flat, unfolded thin material would otherwise support, thereby maintaining both cost-effectiveness and structural performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Data Source

PatentUS10099444B2Paperboard corner, and method of manufacturing the same
Publication Date: 2018.10.16 ABZAC CANADA INC
  • US10099444B2 patent drawing
  • US10099444B2 patent drawing
  • US10099444B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention concerns an elongated protective corner for the transport and/or packaging of products. The corner has at least two non-corrugated paperboard plies combined together to create two perpendicular wings and an apex The plies form multiple ply sections, and at least one of the ply sections of a given ply overlaps another ply section of the same ply. This overlapping arrangement gives the apex a resistance force of about 100 to about 500 lbs. The thickness of the corner can vary, with each wing being in the range of about 100 to about 250 points, and each ply is made from paperboard having a grammage of about 120 to about 380 g/m2. The resistance force can be determined by mounting the corner upon two blocks, and applying a force to the apex at a middle of the corner until a fracture is detected.