Parachute Container Link Unlocking via Cutting Tool

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing systems for closing parachute containers using a link between eyelets face challenges in maintaining consistent tension due to variable parachute volume and spring thrust, leading to unpredictable actuation forces and risks of premature opening or excessive effort during deployment.

Innovation Solution

A device with a cutting tool that can sever the closure link, allowing manual actuation to reduce the force required for unlocking, featuring a movable shuttle and retention mechanisms to manage tension variations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the loop length is adjusted to control tension, then the actuating force on the opening handle can be controlled, but the adjustment is not repeatable and not sustainable throughout the folding period

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuating forceVSAvoidadjustment sustainability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-adjusts the loop length to an optimal value before deployment. This preliminary adjustment ensures that the loop has the correct initial tension characteristics, eliminating the need for repeated adjustments during the folding period and ensuring sustainable operation throughout the parachute's service life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a simple, fixed loop length design that does not require complex adjustment mechanisms. The loop is designed to be reliable for its intended service period without needing maintenance or re-adjustment, treating the adjustment as a one-time preliminary action rather than an ongoing requirement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Ease of operation

If the loop is set too long, then the closing system can be easily unlocked, but there is a risk of unexpected disengagement of the pin due to lack of tension

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunlocking easeVSAvoidpin retention
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the loop length parameter to a specific value that balances two opposing requirements: it is long enough to allow easy unlocking operation, but short enough to maintain sufficient tension on the closing pin. This precise parameter selection eliminates the need for complex adjustment mechanisms while ensuring both ease of operation and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the loop is set too short, then the pin remains securely locked, but excessive operating forces are required on the opening handle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepin retentionVSAvoidoperating force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent selects an optimal loop length parameter that prevents excessive tension while maintaining secure pin retention. This optimized parameter ensures that the loop is not so short as to require excessive force for unlocking, while still being short enough to maintain reliable pin engagement throughout the folding period.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Power

If the spring power is increased to propel the parachute beyond the depression zone, then the extraction capability is improved, but the tension of the closing loop and actuating force increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextractor thrustVSAvoidactuating force
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-adjusts the loop length to account for the high spring power extractor. By setting the loop length optimally before deployment, the system compensates for the high tension that will be generated by the powerful spring, ensuring that the actuating force remains manageable even with increased extractor thrust.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the loop length parameter specifically to work with high-power spring extractors. This parameter optimization allows the system to maintain manageable actuating forces despite the increased spring power, by precisely controlling the initial tension characteristics of the closing loop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution stabilizes the actuation force, ensuring consistent unlocking of the parachute container regardless of tension changes, reducing the risk of untimely openings and simplifying the extraction process.

Implementation Method 1

a thrust exerted by a spring of an extractor device placed in the container between the compressed parachute and the flaps of the container

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

a cutting tool capable of cutting the link to unlock the closure system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFracture Mechanics: Fracture Mechanics

Data Source

PatentEP3759019B1Unlocking device of a fastening means of a container by means of a link and container provided with such an unlocking device
Publication Date: 2024.08.21 SAFRAN AEROSYST
  • EP3759019B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3759019B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3759019B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

This device for unlocking a system for closing a container by means of a tie (12), such as a rope or strap, in particular a tie tensioned between closing eyelets, comprises a cutting tool (O) capable of cutting the tie in order to unlock the closing system. It comprises an actuation member (16) linked to the cutting tool, said actuation member being capable of being manipulated manually by the user in order to cause the cutting tool (O) to move into a position for severing said tie.