Parallel Bale-Forming Chambers for High-Capacity Square Balers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current square balers have limited capacity due to reliance on single baling chambers and knotter assemblies, which restrict bale production rate and consistency, leading to inefficiencies and maneuverability issues when attempting to increase output.

Innovation Solution

A high-capacity square baler design featuring multiple baling chambers and stuffer chutes that allow simultaneous formation of multiple bales from a single windrow, with synchronized plunger and knotter assemblies to manage crop material compression and tying.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single baling chamber with single gearbox, plunger, and knotter assembly is used, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity is limited to one bale at a time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebale production rateVSAvoidnumber of baling chambers and assemblies
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The baler is divided into multiple independent baling chambers (first and second baling chambers), each with its own plunger and knotter assembly. This segmentation allows simultaneous formation of multiple bales, doubling productivity while maintaining modular complexity management through shared external components like the pickup mechanism and power source.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple baling chambers are combined within a single baler frame, sharing common external systems including the pickup mechanism, stuffer chutes, power source, and control systems. This merging approach increases productivity by enabling parallel bale formation while avoiding proportional increases in overall device complexity through resource sharing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Productivity

If plunger speed is increased to boost capacity, then productivity improves, but knotter assembly reliability deteriorates at high speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebaling speedVSAvoidknotter assembly reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The knotting function is segmented into independent knotter assemblies for each baling chamber, allowing each knotter to operate at optimized, lower speeds while the overall system maintains high productivity through parallel operation. This eliminates the need to increase individual plunger speeds, preserving knotter reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A second knotter assembly is provided as a copy of the first, enabling simultaneous bale tying in parallel chambers. This copying approach distributes the tying workload, allowing each knotter to operate at reliable speeds while the system achieves doubled production capacity through concurrent operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If thicker flakes are used to increase bale capacity, then productivity improves, but bale consistency and length uniformity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial processing capacityVSAvoidbale length consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The crop material flow is segmented into separate stuffer chutes leading to each baling chamber, allowing independent control of material distribution. This segmentation enables consistent flake thickness and bale dimensions in each chamber while maintaining high overall productivity through parallel processing of multiple material streams.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each baling chamber maintains its own optimized flake formation and compression characteristics, allowing local quality control for consistent bale dimensions. The system achieves high productivity by processing multiple localized streams simultaneously rather than forcing a single high-capacity stream that would compromise uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances bale production efficiency by enabling the simultaneous formation of multiple bales with consistent size and density, improving maneuverability and reducing the need for multiple balers.

Implementation Method 1

a pickup mechanism configured to pick up a single windrow of crop material off the ground

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

one or more stuffer assemblies, each configured to force crop material generally upward through one of the stuffer chutes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 3

a plurality of separate bale-forming chambers, each configured to receive crop material from one or more of the stuffer chutes and to form a bale of crop material therein

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS11825773B2High capacity baler
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 GREAT PLAINS MANUFACTURING INC
  • US11825773B2 patent drawing
  • US11825773B2 patent drawing
  • US11825773B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A high capacity square baler including a pickup mechanism configured to pick up a single windrow of crop material off the ground. The baler additionally includes one or more stuffer chutes each configured to receive at least a portion of the crop material picked up by the pickup mechanism. The baler additionally includes one or more stuffer assemblies each configured to push crop generally upward through one of the stuffer chutes. The baler further includes a plurality of separate bale-forming chambers each configured to receive crop material from one or more of the stuffer chutes and to form a bale of crop material therein.