Parallel Cell Layout for Flexible Multi-Vehicle Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional vehicle manufacturing methods are inflexible and unable to efficiently produce various vehicle types, leading to limitations in responding to diverse customer needs and accommodating rapid changes in product cycles, especially in abnormal situations or when operating within urban environments.

Innovation Solution

A parallel cell-based mobility production system comprising a front serial production line, a parallel production line with matrix-arranged cells, and a rear serial production line, allowing for flexible operation and rapid changes in production facilities, enabling the production of multiple vehicle types without shutdowns or separate constructions, even in abnormal situations, and allowing for urban factory installations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a conventional mass production method with conveyors is used, then production efficiency for single vehicle type is improved, but flexibility to produce various vehicle types deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidflexibility to produce various vehicle types
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The production system is divided into multiple independent cells (first cell, second cell, third cell, fourth cell) that can operate autonomously. Each cell is equipped with its own conveyor and can process vehicles independently, allowing simultaneous production of different vehicle types without interfering with other cells. This segmentation enables both high productivity within each cell and flexibility across the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically assigns vehicles to different cells based on vehicle type and production requirements. The control unit can redirect vehicles between cells and adjust production sequences in real-time, enabling the system to adapt to changing customer demands and produce various vehicle types efficiently without reconfiguring the entire production line.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If a consistent sequence production line is used, then manufacturing process simplicity is improved, but response to diverse customer needs deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process simplicityVSAvoidresponse to diverse customer needs
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The production line is segmented into multiple independent cells, each capable of performing complete or partial manufacturing processes. This allows the system to maintain simple, standardized processes within each cell while combining them in various sequences to meet diverse customer requirements for different vehicle types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each cell is designed with universal capabilities to handle multiple vehicle types and manufacturing tasks. The cells can be configured to perform different operations based on the vehicle type being produced, enabling a single cell to serve multiple functions and the entire system to respond flexibly to diverse customer needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Stability of the object's composition

If all processes have the same working hours, then production line synchronization is improved, but production continuity in abnormal situations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction line synchronizationVSAvoidproduction continuity in abnormal situations
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the production line into independent cells with separate conveyors and control systems, each cell can operate autonomously during abnormal situations. If one cell experiences issues, others can continue production, maintaining overall production continuity while allowing individual cells to be maintained or adjusted independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows different working hours and operational parameters for each cell based on actual production needs and abnormal situations. The control unit can adjust the operation status, speed, and sequence of each cell independently, enabling flexible response to disruptions while maintaining synchronization when normal operations resume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If traditional vehicle manufacturing method is used, then cost efficiency is improved, but ability to quickly produce various vehicles deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost efficiencyVSAvoidability to quickly produce various vehicles
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The segmented cell-based structure allows for modular expansion and efficient utilization of resources. Each cell can be optimized for specific tasks while sharing common infrastructure, reducing overall manufacturing costs. Simultaneously, the system can quickly reconfigure production across multiple cells to produce various vehicle types efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The dynamic vehicle assignment and cell configuration capabilities enable the system to optimize production sequences and resource allocation in real-time, reducing changeover times and setup costs when switching between different vehicle types. This dynamic flexibility allows quick production of various vehicles without sacrificing cost efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11840297B2Parallel cell based mobility production system
Publication Date: 2023.12.12 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US11840297B2 patent drawing
  • US11840297B2 patent drawing
  • US11840297B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment parallel cell based mobility production system includes a front serial production line which is composed of one or more cells arranged in series and through which vehicles of various types sequentially pass to be processed, a parallel production line provided with a plurality of cells arranged in a matrix form, and a rear serial production line in which the vehicles of various types passed through the parallel production line are sequentially fed.