Parallel Output Channel Load Balancing With Active Current Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing power supply apparatuses with parallel-connected output channels face challenges in achieving low-loss load balancing due to unequal current distribution among branches, which is exacerbated by temperature-dependent resistance variations and manufacturing tolerances, leading to inefficiencies and increased power loss.

Innovation Solution

A power supply apparatus with a controller that detects instantaneous output currents, determines utilization levels, and controls current regulators to form a subset of output channels with the highest and lowest utilization levels, ensuring load balancing by adjusting the current limiting mode of these channels, using field-effect transistors or bipolar transistors to minimize losses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If passive load balancing methods relying on temperature-dependent resistance are used, then load distribution occurs naturally, but manufacturing tolerances and circuit design variations cause unequal current distribution and increased power loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower lossVSAvoidcurrent distribution equality
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements an active feedback control system that continuously monitors current distribution among parallel output channels and dynamically adjusts switching elements to equalize current flow. Sensors detect current imbalances caused by manufacturing tolerances or thermal variations, and the control system responds by modulating the switching elements to redistribute current, thereby maintaining equal load sharing and minimizing power loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes the on-resistance parameter of switching elements through active control to compensate for manufacturing tolerances and thermal drift. By adjusting the switching element parameters in real-time based on detected current distribution, the system equalizes current flow across parallel channels, resolving the contradiction between natural passive balancing and the need for precise current distribution equality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If MOSFETs with lower RDS,on are used to reduce power loss, then current distribution becomes more unequal due to manufacturing tolerances, but using higher resistance MOSFETs increases power loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower lossVSAvoidRDS,on tolerance sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback control system continuously monitors the actual current distribution and detects deviations caused by RDS,on manufacturing tolerances. When current imbalance is detected, the system adjusts the switching elements to compensate for the resistance variations, allowing the use of low-RDS,on MOSFETs while maintaining equal current distribution despite manufacturing precision variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system automatically detects and compensates for RDS,on variations without external intervention. The system self-adjusts the switching element parameters to equalize current distribution, allowing the power supply to maintain optimal performance despite manufacturing tolerances in the MOSFET resistance parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Power

If parallel connection of output channels is implemented to extend power capacity, then cost-effective power expansion is achieved, but unequal current distribution increases power loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput power capacityVSAvoidpower loss
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback control system monitors current distribution across all parallel output channels and dynamically adjusts switching elements to equalize current flow. This ensures that the full power capacity of the parallel-connected channels is utilized efficiently, minimizing power loss while maintaining the cost-effective power extension benefits of the parallel architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The active control system continuously maintains optimal current distribution across parallel channels, ensuring that all channels operate at their intended capacity throughout operation. This continuous adjustment prevents power loss from unequal distribution while maintaining the extended power capacity that motivated the parallel connection in the first place.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Ease of operation

If dynamic switching operation is used to control current distribution, then current is determined by threshold voltage, but the MOSFET with lower threshold voltage assumes disproportionate switching losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching controlVSAvoidswitching losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback control system detects disproportionate switching losses caused by threshold voltage variations and adjusts the switching elements to equalize the switching burden. By monitoring current distribution and switching losses, the system dynamically modifies switching parameters to ensure that no single MOSFET bears excessive switching losses, maintaining ease of operation while reducing total switching losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the switching parameters of individual MOSFETs based on their threshold voltage characteristics. By adjusting switching timing, duration, or amplitude for each device, the system equalizes switching losses across parallel channels while maintaining the dynamic switching control needed for responsive current distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables low-loss load balancing across output channels by dynamically adjusting current distribution, maintaining stability and reducing power loss, even under varying operating conditions.

Implementation Method 1

In stationary mode, the respective RDS,on determines the current distribution. The MOSFET with the lower resistance assumes the greater current flow.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical Resistance: Electrical Resistance

Implementation Method 2

the current is incorporated quadratically into the power loss of the MOSFET

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule Heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS20260010187A1Load Balancing of Parallel-Connected Output Channels of a Power Supply Apparatus
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 SIEMENS AG
  • US20260010187A1 patent drawing
  • US20260010187A1 patent drawing
  • US20260010187A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A power supply apparatus, in particular an electronic fuse for a power supply, includes a first set of output channels and a controller for load balancing between the output channels of the first set, wherein a first number of output channels in the first set is greater than or equal to two, where the output channels of the first each have a current regulator and a switching element, the current regulators are configured to control the switching element in its respective output channel, where the output channels of the first set each have an instantaneous output current and a rated current, and where it is possible for the output channels of the first set (M1) to be connected in parallel.