Parallel Channel Estimation for Low-Latency Wireless Equalization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing signal processing systems face challenges in efficiently estimating and correcting wireless signals impaired by time-selective and frequency-selective artifacts, noise, and interference, particularly in high-speed communication environments like 5G networks, where low latency and high reliability are critical.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing a parallel processing approach with graphics processing units (GPUs) and central processing units (CPUs) to perform channel estimation and equalization in parallel, employing algorithms like MMSE and techniques such as Cholesky or LU factorization to minimize estimation errors and achieve low latency and high reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If parallel processing with GPUs and CPUs is used to perform channel estimation and equalization, then processing speed and accuracy are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal processing speedVSAvoidprocessor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The signal processing task is divided into multiple independent channel estimation and equalization operations that can be executed in parallel across multiple GPU and CPU cores. Each processor handles a specific portion of the frequency spectrum or spatial stream, enabling simultaneous processing without requiring complex inter-processor coordination for each calculation step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs a multi-functional processor architecture where GPUs and CPUs work together to perform both channel estimation and equalization functions. The same hardware resources are utilized for multiple signal processing tasks, reducing the need for dedicated specialized hardware for each function while maintaining high processing speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If advanced algorithms like MMSE, Cholesky, or LU factorization are employed, then estimation accuracy is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel estimation accuracyVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects among different algorithms (MMSE, Cholesky, LU factorization) based on channel conditions, signal-to-noise ratio, and latency requirements. By changing the algorithmic approach according to operational parameters, the system achieves high accuracy when needed while avoiding unnecessary computational complexity in less demanding scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The implementation uses optimized versions of complex algorithms that perform only the necessary calculations for the given problem size and accuracy requirements. Rather than implementing full general-purpose versions of MMSE or matrix factorization, the system applies tailored implementations that compute only the essential components needed for channel estimation, reducing overall computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If signal processing is performed to correct time-selective and frequency-selective artifacts, then signal quality is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal reproduction qualityVSAvoidprocessing latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs channel estimation using reference signals that are transmitted periodically before actual data transmission. By pre-characterizing the channel response to time-selective and frequency-selective effects, the equalization process can quickly compensate for these artifacts during data reception without requiring extensive real-time processing, thus reducing latency while maintaining signal quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The parallel processing architecture enables continuous channel estimation and equalization operations to proceed simultaneously with data reception. Multiple processors continuously update channel estimates and apply equalization without interrupting the data flow, ensuring that signal quality correction occurs without adding significant processing latency to the communication system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS12519679B2Signal processing in parallel
Publication Date: 2026.01.06 NVIDIA CORP
  • US12519679B2 patent drawing
  • US12519679B2 patent drawing
  • US12519679B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatuses, systems, and techniques to perform channel estimation on one or more signals. In at least one embodiment, channel estimation on one or more wireless signals is performed in parallel based on one or more frequencies of one or more signals.