Parallel Check Valve for Fast Hydraulic Filling in Variable Valve Actuation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing variable valve actuation systems for internal combustion engines face challenges in rapidly and completely filling the high pressure side, especially during cold startup conditions, due to limited passage areas and high oil viscosity, leading to incomplete pressurization and potential mechanical stress.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a high pressure check valve in parallel with the solenoid valve to increase the passage area for fluid flow, allowing oil to flow from the tank to the pressurized fluid chamber, thereby enhancing the filling process of the high pressure side.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If a single solenoid valve is used to control fluid flow to the pressurized fluid chamber, then the system structure remains simple, but the passage area is limited and filling speed is slow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilling speedVSAvoidvalve configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines a solenoid valve and a check valve into a parallel configuration to control fluid flow to the pressurized fluid chamber. This merging of two valve types creates a composite valve assembly that provides both a controllable path (through the solenoid valve) and a free-flow path (through the check valve), thereby increasing the total passage area and filling speed without requiring an overly complex system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The fluid control function is segmented into two separate valve paths: one path through the solenoid valve for controlled flow, and another path through the check valve for unrestricted flow. This segmentation allows each valve to be optimized for its specific function while collectively providing superior filling performance compared to a single valve system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of time

If the passage area is increased to improve filling speed, then the filling time is reduced, but the valve size and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressurization timeVSAvoidvalve assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By merging the solenoid valve and check valve in parallel, the system achieves a larger effective passage area without proportionally increasing overall valve assembly complexity. The check valve provides a simple, passive flow path that complements the active solenoid valve control, creating an efficient dual-path configuration that reduces pressurization time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The check valve acts as an intermediary element that provides a supplemental flow path. During the filling phase, when the solenoid valve is open, the check valve allows additional fluid to flow freely into the pressurized chamber, effectively mediating the flow augmentation without requiring complex control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Quantity of substance

If the solenoid valve passage area is increased to improve filling, then the valve dimensions increase, but the system response time and compactness are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid flow capacityVSAvoidvalve dimensions
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The fluid flow capacity is segmented across two separate valve paths rather than requiring a single large-valve passage. The solenoid valve maintains its compact, controllable dimensions while the check valve provides an additional flow path, collectively achieving the required fluid quantity without increasing individual valve dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of increasing the passage area within a single valve (one-dimensional approach), the system adds another flow dimension by introducing a parallel valve path. This dimensional approach to flow capacity allows the system to handle larger fluid quantities without increasing the footprint or dimensions of individual valve components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Reliability

If the system uses a single valve for both control and filling, then the system remains simple, but incomplete pressurization occurs during cold startup

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressurization completenessVSAvoidvalve system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the solenoid valve (for controlled operation) and the check valve (for free-flow supplementation) into a unified valve assembly. This combination ensures complete and reliable pressurization during cold startup conditions by providing both controlled and unrestricted flow paths, eliminating the incomplete pressurization issue that occurs with single-valve systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The check valve is pre-configured as a backup flow path that activates when additional flow is needed. During cold startup or high-demand conditions, the check valve provides beforehand cushioning by allowing extra fluid to flow into the pressurized chamber, ensuring that pressurization completeness is maintained even when the solenoid valve alone would be insufficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration ensures rapid and complete filling of the high pressure side, reducing the time needed for pressurization and minimizing mechanical stress on system components, even in cold conditions, thereby improving engine startup efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

a check valve hydraulically connected between said first tank and said pressurized fluid chamber, said check valve being adapted to allow a fluid flow only out of said first tank towards said pressurized fluid chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCheck valve flow control: Valve

Implementation Method 2

a solenoid valve hydraulically connected to said pressurized fluid chamber and to said actuator, said solenoid valve being adapted to set a hydraulic connection of said pressurized fluid chamber and of said actuator with an exhaust environment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolenoid actuation: Solenoid

Implementation Method 3

a hydraulic accumulator, hydraulically connected to said first tank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic accumulation: Hydraulic Accumulator

Implementation Method 4

a hydraulic supply line of said tank, connected thereto, and having a first check valve adapted to allow a fluid flow towards said tank only

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCheck valve flow control: Valve

Data Source

PatentUS8230830B2Electronically controlled hydraulic system for variable actuation of the valves of an internal combustion engine, with fast filling of the high pressure side of the system
Publication Date: 2012.07.31 CENTRO RICERCHE FIAT SCPA
  • US8230830B2 patent drawing
  • US8230830B2 patent drawing
  • US8230830B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electronically controlled hydraulic system for variable actuation of the valves of an internal combustion engine is constructed for fast filling of the high pressure side of the system.