Parallel Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Class-D Modulation for Audio Dynamic Range

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Personal audio devices face challenges in maintaining a high dynamic range of audio signals while minimizing signal noise, as increased dynamic range through high-gain amplifiers can be offset by noise that masks lower-intensity audio signals.

Innovation Solution

A system with an open-loop and closed-loop Class-D modulator, where a control subsystem selects either modulator based on signal characteristics, using an open-loop modulator for lower-magnitude signals to reduce noise and power consumption, and a closed-loop modulator for higher-magnitude signals to enhance linearity, with techniques to minimize audio artifacts during path transitions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a high-gain amplifier is used to increase dynamic range, then the dynamic range is improved, but signal noise increases and masks lower-intensity audio signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic rangeVSAvoidsignal noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The audio signal path is segmented into two separate modulator paths: an open-loop modulator for low-level signals and a closed-loop modulator for high-level signals. This segmentation allows each modulator to be optimized for its specific signal range, preventing noise from masking low-intensity signals while maintaining high dynamic range capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different quality characteristics are applied to different signal levels: the open-loop modulator provides low noise performance for low-level signals, while the closed-loop modulator provides high linearity for high-level signals. This local quality differentiation resolves the contradiction between noise reduction and dynamic range enhancement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If an open-loop modulator is used for lower-magnitude signals, then noise and power consumption are reduced, but linearity may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal noiseVSAvoidsignal linearity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The signal processing is segmented by amplitude level, with open-loop modulation handling low-level signals where noise reduction is critical, and closed-loop modulation handling high-level signals where linearity is more important. This segmentation allows each path to be optimized for its primary function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the operational parameters by switching between open-loop and closed-loop modulation modes based on signal magnitude. This parameter change allows the system to optimize noise performance for low-level signals while maintaining linearity for high-level signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If a closed-loop modulator is used for higher-magnitude signals, then linearity is enhanced, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal linearityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The power consumption is segmented by signal level: the high-power closed-loop modulator is activated only when necessary for high-level signals requiring superior linearity, while the low-power open-loop modulator handles low-level signals. This segmentation reduces overall power consumption while maintaining linearity where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system periodically switches between open-loop and closed-loop modulation based on the instantaneous signal magnitude, activating the power-intensive closed-loop path only during periods when high-level signals are present, thereby reducing average power consumption while maintaining linearity when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Stability of the object's composition

If switching between open-loop and closed-loop modulators is implemented, then dynamic range enhancement is achieved, but audio artifacts may occur during path transitions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic rangeVSAvoidaudio artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing the input signal and predicting when switching between modulation paths will occur. This allows the system to prepare for transitions in advance, ensuring smooth handoff between open-loop and closed-loop modulators and preventing audible artifacts during path switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms to monitor the output signals from both open-loop and closed-loop modulators during transitions. This feedback allows the system to detect and correct potential artifacts in real-time, ensuring smooth transitions between modulation paths while maintaining enhanced dynamic range performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10720888B2Systems and methods for dynamic range enhancement using an open-loop modulator in parallel with a closed-loop modulator
Publication Date: 2020.07.21 CIRRUS LOGIC INC
  • US10720888B2 patent drawing
  • US10720888B2 patent drawing
  • US10720888B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An integrated circuit may have two signal paths: an open-loop modulator (which may comprise a digital-input Class-D amplifier) and a closed-loop modulator (which may comprise an analog-input Class-D amplifier). A control subsystem may be capable of selecting either of the open-loop modulator or the closed-loop modulator as a selected path based on one or more characteristics (e.g., signal magnitude) of an input audio signal. For example, for higher-magnitude signals, the closed-loop modulator may be selected while the open-loop modulator may be selected for lower-magnitude signals. In some instances, when the open-loop modulator is selected as the selected path, the closed-loop modulator may power off, which may reduce power consumption. In addition, one or more techniques may be applied to reduce or eliminate user-perceptible audio artifacts caused by switching between the open-loop modulator and the closed-loop modulator, and vice versa.