Parallel Compaction Ejection Press for Compactable Materials

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing compacting presses for materials are sequential in operation, limiting the duration of compaction, ejection, and binding processes, as strapping can only occur after complete ejection and retraction, which restricts productivity.

Innovation Solution

Decoupling compaction and ejection processes allows for independent operation, enabling strapping during ejection and parallel preparation for the next compaction cycle, with distinct axes for compaction, transfer, and ejection, and the use of hydraulic pistons for efficient thrust generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a sequential compaction and ejection process is used, then the structure is simple, but the productivity is limited due to sequential operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompaction and ejection speedVSAvoidpress structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The press is divided into independent functional modules: compaction means with compaction means, transfer means, and ejection means. Each module operates independently along its own axis, allowing parallel execution of compaction, transfer, and ejection operations, thereby increasing productivity without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces multiple spatial dimensions for different operations: compaction occurs along a first axis, transfer along a second axis, and ejection along a third axis. This multi-dimensional arrangement enables simultaneous operations in different directions, resolving the productivity-complexity contradiction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Loss of time

If strapping occurs after complete ejection and retraction, then the operation is simple, but the processing time is extended

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompaction and strapping timeVSAvoidoperational sequence complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The strapping operation is performed in advance during the ejection phase rather than waiting for complete compaction and retraction. The binding device applies straps to the compacted material while it is being ejected, overlapping operations to reduce total cycle time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The press maintains continuous operation by overlapping the compaction cycle with the ejection and strapping cycle. While one block is being compacted, the previous block is being ejected and strapped simultaneously, eliminating idle time and reducing overall processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Ease of repair

If the compaction axis and ejection axis are aligned, then the structure is compact, but the maintenance access is difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance accessVSAvoidpress footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention positions the ejection axis perpendicular to the compaction axis, utilizing a different spatial dimension. This orthogonal arrangement provides clear access paths for maintenance personnel and equipment to reach internal components without increasing the overall footprint excessively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces overall processing time, potentially increasing productivity by up to 50% and allowing for continuous operation with improved compacted material density and uniformity.

Implementation Method 1

the compaction means and the ejection means each comprise a piston and a thrust block, respectively called the compaction block and the ejection block, the piston driving the compaction block and the piston driving the ejection block each being connected to a separate hydraulic pressure line

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure: Hydraulic Press

Data Source

PatentEP3227100B1Press for compactable materials, having compacting and ejection in parallel
Publication Date: 2021.06.23 COPEX
  • EP3227100B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3227100B1 patent drawingFigure 3~6
  • EP3227100B1 patent drawingFigure 7~9

AI summary

The present invention relates to a press (P) for compactable materials, comprising: - a compacting chamber (16) comprising compacting means (10, 14) along a compacting axis (1) that are intended to compact compactable materials into a block of compacted materials and to position this block at a first location (E1), - means (20, 40) for transferring the block of compacted materials along a transfer axis (2) from the first location to a second location, said transfer axis being transverse to said compacting axis, - means (30) for ejecting the block of compacted materials from the second location and out of said press, along an ejection axis (3) that is separate from the compacting axis and the transfer axis and is transverse to the transfer axis.