Parallel-Conveyor Product Pick-Up for Accurate Warehouse Fulfillment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The traditional goods-to-person picking method in warehousing and logistics faces inefficiencies, high labor costs, and accuracy issues, as the steps from shelves to order boxes are still performed by people, necessitating more efficient and automated solutions.

Innovation Solution

A goods picking system with parallel transport lines, a transferring system, and a picking device that automates the transfer and picking of containers, using self-driven robots and mechanical arms to move shelves and bins, and a control system for precise order fulfillment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional person-to-goods picking is used, then device complexity is low, but productivity is low and accuracy is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepicking efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements goods-to-person picking by inverting the traditional person-to-goods approach. The conveying device brings storage containers to the picking device, reversing the flow direction. This inversion enables automated high-speed picking while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The system is divided into independent functional modules: conveying device, storage container, picking device, and receiving container. Each module operates semi-independently, allowing the system to achieve high productivity through coordinated automation while keeping individual component complexity low and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If automated goods-to-person picking is implemented, then productivity improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepicking efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The conveying device serves multiple functions: it conveys storage containers to the picking device, returns empty containers, and coordinates with the picking device timing. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated devices for each function, thereby improving productivity while controlling overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements automated container management where the conveying device automatically returns empty containers to storage positions and the picking device automatically transfers goods to receiving containers. This self-service automation eliminates manual intervention, significantly boosting productivity while the standardized processes keep complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If manual steps from shelves to order boxes are used, then device complexity is low, but accuracy is poor and labor cost is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepicking accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control device coordinates the conveying and picking operations with feedback mechanisms that track container positions, picking status, and container availability. This feedback system ensures high picking accuracy by verifying each operation while maintaining systematic control that prevents complexity from becoming unmanageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical picking operations with an automated picking device that uses controlled mechanisms to transfer goods. This substitution dramatically improves picking accuracy by eliminating human error while the standardized mechanical systems remain sufficiently simple through proven design patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If more automated devices are added, then productivity improves, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepicking efficiencyVSAvoidoperation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control device merges the coordination functions for the conveying device, storage container management, and picking device operations into a single integrated control system. This consolidation improves productivity through coordinated automation while simplifying operation by providing unified control rather than multiple independent control interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP3943420B1Product pick-up system and product pick-up method
Publication Date: 2025.08.13 BEIJING GEEKPLUS TECH CO LTD
  • EP3943420B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3943420B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3943420B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A product pick-up system and a product pick-up method. The pick-up system comprises: a transport device (2) comprising a first conveying line (21) and a second conveying line (22); a handling system used to move a target container (4) from a container storage zone to the first conveying line (21), and to move the target container from the second conveying line (22) to the container storage zone; and a pick-up device (5) used to pick up a product specified in an order. The product pick-up system and the product pick-up method can enhance management efficiency of product pick-up systems and warehouse logistics systems.