Parallel Medical Device Testing With Profile-Based Pass Criteria

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual testing of medical devices is time-consuming and prone to errors, and the testing requirements vary based on whether the device will have contact with a patient or not.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a test device and a user computing device that facilitates parallel testing of medical devices by receiving an ID, selecting a profile with preset simulation parameter values, initiating testing, and determining a test result based on pass criteria through comparison with simulation parameter values.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual testing is used for medical devices, then testing can be performed with simple equipment, but the testing process is time-consuming and prone to errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting speedVSAvoidtesting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The testing system performs self-testing by automatically comparing measured parameter values against stored simulation parameter values and pass/fail criteria, eliminating the need for manual operator intervention in the comparison and determination processes, thereby reducing errors and improving efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical testing operations with an automated electronic system that uses processors to control test execution, compare parameters, and determine pass/fail results, substituting human operators with automated computing devices to improve both speed and accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If comprehensive testing profiles are used to ensure safety, then testing coverage is improved, but the complexity of the testing process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting coverageVSAvoidtesting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The testing system is divided into distinct functional modules: a test device for performing measurements, a user computing device for controlling the test and storing criteria, and an automated comparison process, allowing each component to handle specific aspects of the complex testing process independently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The user computing device acts as an intermediary between the test device and the pass/fail criteria database, managing the storage, retrieval, and comparison of parameter values, thereby simplifying the overall system architecture while maintaining comprehensive testing capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of time

If parallel testing of multiple parameters is implemented, then wait time is reduced, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting wait timeVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple parameter measurements and comparisons into a single integrated testing process, where the processor simultaneously manages multiple test parameters, simulation values, and pass/fail criteria comparisons, reducing total testing time while consolidating system complexity into a unified architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12436066B2Systems and methods of parallel testing of medical devices
Publication Date: 2025.10.07 PRONK TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US12436066B2 patent drawing
  • US12436066B2 patent drawing
  • US12436066B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, devices, and methods for testing medical devices comprising: a test device configured for testing a medical device; and a user computing device in communication with the test device, where the user computing device comprises a processor having addressable memory, where the processor is configured to: receive an ID of the medical device to be tested; select a profile associated with the received ID of the medical device; select a preset associated with the selected profile; initiate testing of the medical device by the test device; receive one or more parameter values from based on test information results from the test device; determine a test result based on pass criteria from a comparison of the received one or more parameter values to the one or more simulation parameter values of the preset.