Parallel Four-Bar Exoskeleton Architecture for Ball-and-Socket Joints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional exoskeleton robotic devices with serial chain architectures are inefficient for ball and socket joints like the shoulder, hip, wrist, and ankle, as they require larger motors to amplify torques and consume more energy due to the moment arm associated with multiple linkages, which is not anatomically similar to human joints.

Innovation Solution

A parallel actuated exoskeleton architecture using a base and platform connected by multiple substructures, where these substructures are actuated in parallel to move the platform within a spherical workspace, reducing mechanical interference and energy consumption by utilizing a four-bar spherical parallel manipulator with three actuated substructures and cooperative control techniques.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If serial chain architecture with multiple linkages is used to augment ball and socket joint motion, then the joint motion can be achieved, but the moment arm amplifies torques requiring larger motors and consuming more energy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint motion capabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The exoskeleton divides the augmentation function into multiple independent substructures (at least three) that work in parallel, each contributing to the overall motion without requiring large moment arms. This segmentation allows the system to achieve complex ball and socket joint motion while maintaining smaller, more energy-efficient actuators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple actuation paths into a unified parallel architecture where multiple substructures cooperate to move the platform. This combining of parallel actuation paths eliminates the need for large moment arms while maintaining full motion capability, directly reducing energy consumption compared to serial chain approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Adaptability or versatility

If serial chain architecture with multiple linkages is used to augment ball and socket joint motion, then the joint motion can be achieved, but larger motors are required which increase device complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint motion capabilityVSAvoidmotor size
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the actuation function across multiple smaller substructures rather than relying on a few large motors. Each substructure uses smaller motors that work in parallel, reducing individual motor size and overall device complexity while maintaining full motion capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple smaller motorized substructures are merged into a unified parallel system that collectively provides the required motion. This merging allows the use of smaller, less complex motors compared to the large motors required in serial chain architectures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of manufacture

If serial chain architecture is used, then simple one degree-of-freedom joints can be actuated, but ball and socket joints cannot be shared anatomically similar manner

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint actuation simplicityVSAvoidball and socket joint compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The complex ball and socket joint actuation is segmented into multiple independent substructures, each handling a portion of the motion. This segmentation allows the system to achieve complex multi-degree-of-freedom motion while keeping each individual substructure relatively simple and easier to manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from one-dimensional serial chain actuation to multi-dimensional parallel actuation. By arranging substructures in parallel around the joint, the system can accommodate the multi-axis motion of ball and socket joints in an anatomically similar manner, improving adaptability while maintaining manufacturing feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Use of energy by moving object

If parallel actuated architecture is used, then torque and energy consumption are reduced, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the actuation into modular substructures that can be independently designed and controlled. This segmentation reduces energy consumption through parallel actuation while managing complexity through modularity, making the system more maintainable and controllable despite the increased number of components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11590647B2Four-bar parallel actuated architecture for exoskeleton
Publication Date: 2023.02.28 THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNIV OF ARIZONA
  • US11590647B2 patent drawing
  • US11590647B2 patent drawing
  • US11590647B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An exoskeleton for interfacing with a joint includes a base configured to be coupled to a user, a platform configured to be coupled to the user proximate the joint, and a plurality of substructures extending between the base and the platform. The substructures are actuated in parallel in order to move the platform.