Parallel Hydraulic Valve Control Without Compensator Valves

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hydraulic systems in work vehicles often experience excessive energy consumption due to compensator valves creating unnecessary pressure drops, which reduces fuel economy and increases the load on the pump.

Innovation Solution

A system with parallel hydraulic loads and adjustable flow control valves, controlled by a computing system that determines and manages pressure across each load to optimize flow rates and minimize pump pressure, eliminating the need for compensator valves.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If compensator valves are used to maintain predetermined pressure drop across flow control valves, then pressure control is improved, but energy consumption increases and fuel economy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure controlVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes compensator valves from the hydraulic system entirely. Instead of using compensator valves to maintain pressure drops, the system uses a pump controller that adjusts pump discharge pressure dynamically based on real-time pressure sensor feedback from each hydraulic load, eliminating the energy-wasting pressure drops caused by compensator valves

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback control system where pressure sensors monitor the actual pressure at each hydraulic load, and this information is fed back to the pump controller. The controller continuously adjusts the pump discharge pressure to match the minimum required pressure for each load, replacing the open-loop pressure maintenance approach of compensator valves with a closed-loop adaptive system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If compensator valves create predetermined pressure drop across flow control valves, then flow control is maintained, but pump load increases and fuel economy worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow controlVSAvoidfuel economy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static pressure drop maintenance by compensator valves to dynamic pressure adjustment. The pump controller continuously varies the pump discharge pressure based on real-time demands of hydraulic loads, allowing flow control to adapt dynamically to actual system conditions rather than maintaining fixed pressure drops that waste energy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operating parameters of the hydraulic system by eliminating fixed pressure drops and implementing variable pressure control. The pump discharge pressure is adjusted as a variable parameter based on load requirements, replacing the constant pressure drop approach that caused energy losses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple compensator valves are used in parallel hydraulic loads, then individual pressure control is achieved, but system complexity and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual pressure controlVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the pump controller a universal control device that manages pressure for multiple parallel hydraulic loads through a single feedback control system. Instead of requiring separate compensator valves for each load, one intelligent pump controller with multiple pressure sensor inputs provides individual pressure control for all loads, reducing component count and system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the functions of multiple compensator valves into a single pump control system. By combining pressure sensing from all hydraulic loads and centralizing control in the pump controller, the system achieves individual pressure control for each load while eliminating the need for separate compensator valves at each load

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces energy consumption and improves fuel economy by optimizing hydraulic fluid flow and pressure management, allowing the pump to discharge at minimum necessary pressure without compensator valves.

Implementation Method 1

a first pressure sensor configured to capture data indicative of a first pressure of the hydraulic fluid being supplied to the first hydraulic load by the first flow control valve. In addition, the work vehicle includes a second pressure sensor configured to capture data indicative of a second pressure of the hydraulic fluid being supplied to the second hydraulic load by the second flow control valve

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure sensing:

Implementation Method 2

a first flow control valve defining an adjustable orifice, with the first flow control valve fluidly coupled to the first fluid conduit upstream of the first hydraulic load such that the first flow control valve is configured to control a flow rate of the hydraulic fluid to the first hydraulic load

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow control through adjustable orifice:

Data Source

PatentEP4174326A1System and method for controlling hydraulic valve operation within a work vehicle
Publication Date: 2023.05.03 CNH IND ITALIA SPA
  • EP4174326A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4174326A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4174326A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A work vehicle (10) comprises a computing system (148) configured to receive first and second input associated with controlling the operation of the first and second hydraulic load (36, 38), respectively. Furthermore, the computing system (148) is configured to control the operation of a first or second flow control valve (114, 118) corresponding to the one of the first or second hydraulic loads (36, 38) associated with the greater hydraulic fluid pressure such that the corresponding adjustable orifice (116, 118) is at a maximum flow position. Additionally, the computing system (148) is configured to determine the first and second pressures of the hydraulic fluid being supplied to the first or second hydraulic loads (36, 83). Moreover, the computing system (148) is configured to control the operation of the first or second flow control valve (114, 118) corresponding to another of the first or second hydraulic loads (36, 38) based on the corresponding received first or second input and the determined first and second pressures.