Parallel Inverter Phase Current Control via Direct Hysteresis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control methods for phase currents of three-phase inverters connected in parallel struggle with circular currents, which reduce overall power and contribute to harmonic loads, and require complex communication and precalculation of pulse patterns.

Innovation Solution

A direct hysteresis current control method where the measured current space vector is maintained within a hysteresis window about a target current space vector, with the selection of phase currents varied to eliminate zero system currents and reduce switching losses, allowing independent control of each inverter without communication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If indirect current control with pulse width modulation is used, then the pulse patterns can be precalculated, but the system dynamics are reduced and robustness decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecalculation of pulse patternsVSAvoidsystem dynamics
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical precalculation approach of indirect PWM control with a direct hysteresis current control mechanism. Instead of precalculating pulse patterns based on mechanical timing, the system directly compares measured current space vectors with target values and generates switching signals in real-time, achieving both simplicity and high dynamics through this substitution of control methodology

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The direct hysteresis current control allows each inverter to independently regulate its own phase currents without requiring coordinated precalculation with other inverters. Each inverter self-adjusts its switching signals based on its own current measurements and hysteresis band, eliminating the need for complex inter-inverter communication and precalculation while maintaining high dynamic response

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of information

If all three phase currents are measured for every inverter, then complete current information is obtained, but circular currents increase and system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent measurement completenessVSAvoidmeasurement and control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different measurement strategies to different inverters based on their roles. The first inverter measures all three phase currents to establish a reference, while subsequent inverters measure only two phase currents assuming the third can be derived. This local differentiation reduces overall system complexity and circular currents while maintaining sufficient current information for effective control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the measurement parameters dynamically by varying which two phase currents are measured for space vector formation in subsequent inverters. This parameter variation, combined with the assumption that phase currents sum to zero, allows the system to operate with reduced measurement complexity while maintaining control effectiveness and minimizing circular currents

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If inverters are controlled independently without communication, then system modularity increases, but coordination between inverters becomes challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem modularityVSAvoidinverter coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates an equipotential control framework where all inverters operate from a common reference current space vector derived from the first inverter's measurements. This common reference ensures coordinated operation among independently controlled inverters, maintaining reliability and proper current sharing without requiring direct communication between inverters, thus preserving modularity while ensuring coordination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances dynamics and robustness, reduces circular currents, and minimizes switching losses by allowing all phase currents to approximate their target values, thereby increasing system modularity and reducing effort in system realization.

Implementation Method 1

a measured current space vector for measured values of the phase currents of the inverter is held within a hysteresis window about a target current space vector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHysteresis: Hysteresis

Data Source

PatentUS10819249B2Control of phase currents of inverters that are connected in parallel
Publication Date: 2020.10.27 SIEMENS AG
  • US10819249B2 patent drawing
  • US10819249B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a method for controlling phase currents of a plurality of three-phase inverters connected in parallel. The phase currents of each inverter are controlled by direct hysteresis current control wherein an actual current space vector for actual values of the phase currents of each inverter is maintained about a target current space vector within a hysteresis window. The measured current space vector of a first inverter is formed by all three phase currents of the first inverter. The actual current space vector of each additional inverter is formed from exactly two phase currents of the respective additional inverter under the proviso that all three phase currents of the additional inverters add up to zero. The selection of the two phase currents from which the actual current space vector is formed, is varied.