Parallel MRI Acceleration Optimization via Non-Integer k-Space Sampling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current parallel MRI techniques face challenges in achieving optimal acceleration while maintaining signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), particularly in three-dimensional imaging, where acceleration methods often result in reduced SNR and aliasing issues due to non-integer k-space increments and foldover effects.

Innovation Solution

A method for three-dimensional parallel MRI that determines optimal in-plane acceleration factors along phase-encoding directions to generate a k-space sampling pattern, allowing for optimized image reconstruction with minimized noise amplification and SNR loss, using coil sensitivity maps and parallel image reconstruction techniques like SENSE.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If acceleration methods are used to reduce acquisition time, then productivity is improved, but signal-to-noise ratio deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacquisition speedVSAvoidsignal-to-noise ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the acceleration parameter from integer values to non-integer values optimized for specific anatomical regions. By calculating region-specific acceleration factors based on coil sensitivity maps and anatomical variability, the system achieves higher overall acceleration while maintaining acceptable SNR in critical areas. This resolves the contradiction by allowing accelerated acquisition without uniform SNR degradation across the entire image.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different acceleration factors to different regions of the image based on local coil sensitivity and anatomical importance. Critical regions with poor coil sensitivity or high anatomical variability are assigned lower acceleration factors to preserve SNR, while regions with good sensitivity tolerate higher acceleration. This local optimization resolves the contradiction between overall speed improvement and local SNR maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If higher acceleration factors are used, then productivity is improved, but noise amplification increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacquisition speedVSAvoidnoise amplification
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes acceleration factors to non-integer values that balance noise amplification (g-factor) against acquisition time reduction. By using coil sensitivity maps to calculate region-specific acceleration factors, the system identifies the optimal point where further acceleration would cause unacceptable noise amplification in critical regions. This resolves the contradiction by preventing excessive noise amplification while still achieving high overall acceleration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If integer acceleration factors are used, then ease of operation is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of acceleration selectionVSAvoidimage reconstruction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends acceleration factors from integer values to continuous non-integer values, allowing precise optimization for each anatomical region and coil configuration. This continuous parameter optimization improves image reconstruction accuracy by matching the acceleration factor to the actual coil sensitivity distribution, rather than forcing integer values that may be suboptimal. The system maintains ease of operation through automated calculation of these optimized factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary calculation of region-specific acceleration factors using coil sensitivity maps before the actual imaging acquisition. This preliminary optimization step determines the precise acceleration factors that will minimize noise amplification and maximize image quality for the specific patient anatomy and coil configuration. This resolves the contradiction by preparing optimized parameters in advance, making the complex non-integer acceleration transparent to the operator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9459335B2System and method for parallel magnetic resonance imaging with optimally selected in-plane acceleration
Publication Date: 2016.10.04 MAYO FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION & RESEARCH
  • US9459335B2 patent drawing
  • US9459335B2 patent drawing
  • US9459335B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for three-dimensional parallel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using an MRI system is provided. The method includes determining in-plane acceleration factors that optimize a selected criterion, such as an image quality criterion defined by maximal noise amplification in a reconstructed image. The estimated in-plane acceleration factors are used to establish a k-space sampling pattern, which is used to acquire k-space data. An image is reconstructed from the acquired k-space data using a parallel image reconstruction technique.