Parallel Neural Processor Architecture for Complex AI Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional AI systems are limited by the speed of traditional processors, incur large overhead, and are unable to achieve rapid responses to complex problem sets, lacking the ability to emulate human consciousness due to serial processing and predefined boundary conditions.

Innovation Solution

A parallel neural processor architecture that implements hardware neurons capable of parallel processing, incorporating neuroplasticity and implicit memory to facilitate self-learning and intuition, utilizing weighted input modules and comparison modules to process input signals efficiently.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If conventional serial processors are used for AI applications, then system complexity is reduced and ease of manufacture is improved, but processing speed and response time deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidprocessor architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the neural network processing into multiple independent processing elements that operate in parallel. Each processing element handles specific neurons or computational units, allowing simultaneous evaluation of multiple neuron states rather than sequential processing. This segmentation enables the system to achieve high-speed parallel processing while managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from serial (one-dimensional) processing to parallel (multi-dimensional) processing by organizing processing elements in spatial arrays. Multiple processing elements are arranged to handle different portions of the neural network simultaneously, adding a spatial dimension to the processing architecture that enables concurrent execution of multiple computational tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If larger neural networks are implemented to solve more complex problems, then problem-solving capability is improved, but processing time and computational overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproblem-solving capabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides large neural networks into smaller processing blocks that can be evaluated simultaneously. Each processing element handles a subset of neurons, allowing the entire network to be processed in parallel rather than sequentially. This segmentation enables complex problem-solving capabilities while reducing overall processing time through concurrent evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary organization of neural network data and processing elements to enable immediate parallel evaluation. By pre-configuring the processing architecture and data structures, the system can rapidly process complex neural networks without incurring significant computational overhead during execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If conventional processors with larger core counts are used to handle larger neural networks, then processing capability is improved, but system cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capabilityVSAvoidcore count and thread management
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the neural network processing function across multiple simple processing elements rather than using fewer complex cores. Each processing element is designed for specific neural network operations, enabling high productivity through parallel execution while maintaining simplicity in individual element design and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If predefined boundary conditions are imposed on AI systems, then system simplicity and ease of operation are improved, but adaptability to different applications deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication flexibilityVSAvoidsystem configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs processing elements with universal functionality that can handle different neural network configurations and applications. The processing architecture is designed to be application-agnostic, allowing the same hardware to efficiently process various types of neural networks for different problems without requiring complex reconfiguration or predefined boundary conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250217635A1Parallel Neural Processor for Artificial Intelligence
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 SETH ROHIT
  • US20250217635A1 patent drawing
  • US20250217635A1 patent drawing
  • US20250217635A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and/or devices for efficient and intuitive methods for implementing artificial neural networks specifically designed for parallel AI processing are provided herein. In various implementations, the disclosed systems, devices, and methods complement or replace conventional systems, devices, and methods for parallel neural processing that (a) greatly reduce neural processing time necessary to process more complex problem sets; (b) implement neuroplasticity necessary for self-learning; and (c) introduce the concept and application of implicit memory, in addition to explicit memory, necessary to imbue an element of intuition. With these properties, implementations of the disclosed invention make it possible to emulate human consciousness or awareness.