Parallel Overlap Table Search for NVM Read Commands

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current non-volatile memory (NVM) solid state devices face inefficiencies in processing read commands due to the need to scan large overlap tables for data, leading to increased latency and reduced bandwidth, especially at high queue depths where the existing methods are not fast enough to handle the volume of commands effectively.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a parallel search mechanism for the overlap table, allowing multiple read commands to be accumulated and searched simultaneously, rather than individually, which reduces the average search time and increases processing efficiency by optimizing the number of lines and entries scanned.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the entire overlap table is scanned for every read command individually, then overlap detection accuracy is maintained, but processing time increases and bandwidth decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverlap detection accuracyVSAvoidcommand processing bandwidth
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple individual overlap table searches into a single parallel search operation. Multiple read commands are accumulated in a command pool, and their overlap detection is performed simultaneously by scanning the overlap table once for all commands rather than individually for each command. This merging approach maintains detection accuracy while significantly improving processing bandwidth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary accumulation of read commands in a command pool before executing the overlap table search. Commands are gathered and prepared in advance, allowing the system to batch process them together. This preliminary action enables the system to maintain high detection accuracy while reducing the total number of search operations required, thereby improving overall processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the overlap table size increases to track more data ranges, then overlap detection coverage improves, but search time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverlap detection coverageVSAvoidsearch time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple search operations into a single parallel scan of the overlap table. Even as the table grows to cover more data ranges and provide better detection coverage, the system processes all read commands simultaneously in one pass through the table, preventing search time from increasing linearly with table size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from sequential single-command processing to parallel multi-command processing by adding a dimension of simultaneity. Multiple commands are processed across the same overlap table in parallel, allowing the system to handle larger tables without proportionally increasing search time, as the parallelism compensates for the increased data volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Loss of time

If read commands are processed immediately upon arrival, then latency is reduced, but overlap detection accuracy may compromise data correctness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommand processing latencyVSAvoiddata correctness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary accumulation of read commands in a command pool before executing overlap detection. This preliminary batching allows the system to maintain low latency by quickly preparing commands for processing while ensuring that all necessary commands are gathered before the actual overlap check, thereby guaranteeing data correctness without significant latency penalty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains continuous processing by accumulating commands in the command pool and processing them in batches without idle waiting periods. The system continuously receives, accumulates, and processes read commands through the parallel overlap detection mechanism, ensuring both low latency and high reliability by keeping the processing pipeline full and efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS11640264B2Parallel commands overlap detection based on queue-depth
Publication Date: 2023.05.02 SANDISK TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US11640264B2 patent drawing
  • US11640264B2 patent drawing
  • US11640264B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure generally relates to searching an overlap table for data requested to be read in a plurality of read commands received. Rather than searching the table for data corresponding to each command individually, the searching occurs for the plurality of commands in parallel. Furthermore, the overlap table can comprise multiple data entries for each line. The number of read commands can be accumulated prior to searching, with the accumulating being a function of a queue depth permitted by the host device. Parallel searching of the overlap table reduces the average search time.