Parallel-Pivot Joystick Mount for Compact Self-Centering Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional joysticks with ball or cardan joints are bulky, limit haptic and ergonomic performance, require long actuation movements, and lack self-centering and static stability without additional elements like springs.

Innovation Solution

A joystick design using dual pivoting mounts with parallel axes of rotation, allowing for a thin and low-volume base, improved haptic performance, and self-centering without additional elements, along with optional springs or magnets for biasing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If ball joints or cardan joints are used to mount the handle, then the handle can move in multiple directions, but the base encloses a great volume and wastes space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandle movement capabilityVSAvoidbase volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting system is divided into two separate pivoting mounts instead of using a single ball joint or cardan joint. Each pivoting mount provides rotation about a specific axis, and together they enable multi-directional handle movement while requiring less base volume than traditional single-joint configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from single-axis or intersecting-axis rotation to parallel-axis rotation in a different spatial arrangement. The two pivoting mounts have parallel axes of rotation that are spaced apart, creating a planar mounting structure that reduces the vertical and radial space requirements compared to traditional ball joints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If ball joints or cardan joints are used, then the handle can be mounted, but the actuation movement of the hand or lower arm requires to be relatively long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandle mounting capabilityVSAvoidactuation movement length
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the rotation into two separate pivoting mounts with parallel axes, each mount contributes to the overall handle deflection. This segmentation allows for more efficient force transmission and shorter actuation distances compared to single-joint configurations where the entire movement must occur at one pivot point

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If the handle is mounted with traditional joints, then it can be moved in different directions, but the haptic cannot be adapted and the handle is statically unstable without additional elements like springs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-directional movementVSAvoidadditional centering elements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The dual pivoting mount configuration creates inherent self-centering behavior through its mechanical geometry. When the handle is deflected from neutral, the parallel-axis rotation mechanism naturally produces restoring forces that return the handle to center, eliminating the need for external springs or dampers that would otherwise be required for stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using traditional joints that require additional elements for stability, the invention inverts the approach by designing a mounting system where stability and self-centering emerge from the parallel-axis rotation geometry itself. The mechanical advantage is inverted from requiring external stabilization to achieving inherent stability through the mounting configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables shorter actuation movements, improved ergonomic performance, and static stability with self-centering, reducing the need for additional mechanical aids and enhancing operational efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

each pivoting mount being configured to guide relative rotary motion between the base and the teeter board about a respective axis of rotation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRotary motion:

Implementation Method 2

the use of dual pivoting mounts enables self-centring and static mechanical stability of the mounted handle in the neutral position to be achieved without the need for additional supporting elements as springs to centre and hold the handle in the neutral position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelf-centering:

Data Source

PatentUS11874686B2Joystick
Publication Date: 2024.01.16 AGCO INT GMBH
  • US11874686B2 patent drawing
  • US11874686B2 patent drawing
  • US11874686B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A joystick control device including a base and a teeter board supported on the base by at least first and second pivoting mounts, with each pivoting mount guiding relative rotary motion between the base and the teeter board about a respective axis of rotation, and the respective axes of rotation of the first and second pivoting mounts are spaced apart and extend parallel to each other. A handle effects movement of the teeter board, which movement is detected by a sensor arranged to generate an output signal indicative of the position and orientation of the teeter board relative to the base. Third and fourth pivoting mounts having respective axes of rotation perpendicular to those of the first and second pivoting mounts are suitably also provided to enable the device to provide two-axis control.