Parallel Processing Countdown Tagging for Load Latency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current parallel processing architectures face inefficiencies in handling large and complex datasets due to indeterminate memory load latency and inflexible design, which can lead to stalled compute elements and reduced throughput.

Innovation Solution

A parallel processing architecture with countdown tagging, where a two-dimensional array of compute elements is accessed, and load operations are tagged with a countdown tag by a compiler, allowing the control unit to monitor and manage the tag status, ensuring data arrival within a defined time window, thus preventing indeterminate memory load latency and enabling static scheduling integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional parallel processing architectures are used without countdown tagging, then the system can handle memory load operations, but indeterminate memory load latency causes compute elements to stall and throughput to decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidmemory load latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The compiler assigns a countdown tag to each load operation in advance, specifying the number of cycles within which the data must arrive. This preliminary action allows the system to proactively track and enforce timing constraints before actual memory access occurs, preventing compute element stalls by ensuring data arrives within the designated time window.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The countdown tag mechanism provides continuous feedback to the control unit about the timing status of memory load operations. As each cycle passes, the countdown tag is decremented, and when it reaches zero, the control unit is notified. This feedback loop enables real-time monitoring and enforcement of timing constraints, allowing the system to maintain high throughput by preventing stalls before they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the architecture uses flexible memory access without timing constraints, then memory operations can be performed, but static scheduling integrity cannot be ensured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestatic scheduling integrityVSAvoidarchitecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The compiler statically determines and assigns countdown tags to load operations during code generation, based on the known execution schedule. This preliminary assignment of timing constraints allows the architecture to enforce static scheduling integrity without requiring complex runtime decision-making, as the timing requirements are predetermined and embedded in the instruction stream.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The countdown tag introduces a time parameter to memory load operations, transforming them from unconstrained access requests into timing-critical operations. By encoding the maximum allowable latency as a parameter in the load instruction itself, the system can maintain simple control logic while ensuring static scheduling integrity through parameter-driven enforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the system allows compute elements to operate without data validation, then operations can proceed continuously, but late or invalid data can cause processing errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata validityVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The countdown tag mechanism provides continuous feedback to both the control unit and compute elements about the timing status of incoming data. When a countdown tag expires, the control unit is notified and can prevent the compute element from using invalid data. This feedback ensures data validity without requiring continuous stalling, as the system can proceed with operations when timing constraints are satisfied.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system takes preliminary action to prevent the use of invalid data by monitoring countdown tags before compute elements attempt to access the data. When a countdown tag is about to expire or has expired, the system can halt or redirect the operation before invalid data is used, thereby preventing processing errors without requiring continuous validation checks during execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS20230350713A1Parallel processing architecture with countdown tagging
Publication Date: 2023.11.02 ASCENIUM INC
  • US20230350713A1 patent drawing
  • US20230350713A1 patent drawing
  • US20230350713A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for parallel processing based on a parallel processing architecture with countdown tagging are disclosed. A two-dimensional array of compute elements is accessed. Each compute element within the array is known to a compiler and is coupled to its neighboring compute elements within the array of compute elements. A load operation is tagged with a countdown tag. Tagging is performed by the compiler, and the load operation is targeted to a memory system associated with the array of compute elements. The countdown tag comprises a time value. The time value is decremented as the load operation is being performed. The time value that is decremented is based on an architectural cycle. Countdown tag status is monitored by a control unit. The monitoring occurs as the load operation is performed. A load status is generated by the control unit, based on the monitoring. The load status allows compute element operation.