Parallel Product Splitters for Olefin Separation Energy Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional dehydrogenation processes for producing propylene from propane are energy-intensive, requiring high input energy and lacking an efficient method for energy recovery, leading to significant energy consumption.

Innovation Solution

The process employs two product splitters operating in parallel, one at higher pressure and the other at lower pressure, utilizing exhaust steam from steam turbines to supply heat to the reboilers, thereby reducing energy consumption by recovering and reusing previously lost energy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If a single product splitter is used at high pressure with steam reboiling, then propylene separation is achieved, but energy consumption is excessive due to lack of heat recovery

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The single product splitter is divided into two parallel product splitters operating at different pressures (first at high pressure, second at low pressure). This segmentation allows the system to recover and reuse steam energy that would otherwise be lost, as the condensed steam from the first splitter can provide heat to the second splitter, thereby reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining separation effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of discarding the steam after it condenses in the first product splitter, the system recovers and reuses this steam as the heat source for the second product splitter. This recovery principle transforms what would be waste energy into a useful resource, significantly reducing the need for external steam generation and lowering overall energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

2Loss of energy

If exhaust steam from steam turbines is recovered and reused, then energy consumption is reduced, but process complexity increases due to additional equipment and configuration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy recovery efficiencyVSAvoidsystem configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the steam recovery function with the propylene separation function by integrating the two product splitters in parallel configuration. The exhaust steam from the steam turbine is combined with the heat exchange network of the dual splitter system, allowing simultaneous energy recovery and separation operations. This merging eliminates the need for separate heat recovery equipment while achieving both objectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The first product splitter serves dual functions: it separates propylene from propane and simultaneously acts as a heat exchanger that recovers steam energy for use in the second splitter. This multi-functionality reduces the need for dedicated heat recovery equipment and simplifies the overall system configuration while improving energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in a 18-22% reduction in total energy consumption compared to conventional methods, enabling the production of high purity propylene with lower energy expenditure.

Implementation Method 1

The low pressure product splitter has a reboiler that has heat supplied using a heat pump

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat pump compression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

The high pressure product splitter operates at a higher pressure and has a reboiler that has heat supplied using exhaust steam from the steam turbines of the product compressor and the heat pump

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 3

In the product splitter column, propylene is recovered as an overhead stream and unreacted propane from the bottoms stream of the product splitter is recycled back to the dehydrogenation unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDistillation: Distillation

Data Source

PatentEP2303989B1Improved separation process for olefin production
Publication Date: 2016.08.10 LUMMUS TECHNOLOGY INC
  • EP2303989B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2303989B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2303989B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Improved processes for the separation of olefins from paraffins, such as propylene from propane are provided. Two product splitters are used in parallel to separate propylene from propane. One of the product splitters operates at a lower pressure, while the second product splitter operates at a higher pressure. The use of the two splitters in parallel provides a process for recovery of a high purity propylene product with lower energy consumption compared to prior art processes.