Parallel PSU Gating Coordination via Distributed Timing Arbitration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing power supply unit (PSU) coordination methods in parallel power supplies often result in overloading and fault states due to asynchronous turn-on, as they rely on a central controlling mechanism that can fail.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a decentralized communication protocol using independent controller devices with a communication bus, where each PSU autonomously decides on power provisioning based on a timing indicator arbitrated through a CAN protocol, ensuring synchronized power delivery without overloading.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a central controlling mechanism is used to coordinate PSU turn-on, then power provisioning can be managed, but the system becomes vulnerable to central controller failures and single points of failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the centralized control function into distributed control units, where each PSU has its own controller that can independently participate in the gating decision-making process. This segmentation eliminates the single point of failure at the central controller while maintaining coordinated control across all PSUs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each PSU controller autonomously evaluates system conditions and participates in gating decisions without requiring direct commands from a central controller. The controllers self-organize to determine which PSUs should be gated based on local and global system state information, reducing dependency on centralized control infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Device complexity

If PSUs turn on independently without coordination, then system complexity is reduced, but PSUs that turn on first become overloaded and enter fault states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol architecture complexityVSAvoidPSU operational reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a preliminary gating evaluation phase where controllers assess system conditions before actual power provisioning begins. This preliminary action allows PSUs to coordinate their turn-on sequence in advance, preventing overload conditions by ensuring that gating decisions are made based on system capacity before power is actually delivered.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors PSU status, load conditions, and system health metrics, using this feedback information to dynamically adjust gating decisions. Controllers receive real-time information about system state and modify their gating behavior accordingly, preventing overload by responding to feedback about current system capacity and demand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If centralized control is used for PSU gating, then coordination is simplified, but the system creates a single point of failure and reduces autonomy of individual PSUs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegating coordination easeVSAvoidsystem fault tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the control functions of multiple PSUs into a distributed control network where controllers communicate and coordinate autonomously. This merging of control capabilities across multiple independent units achieves the coordination simplicity of centralized control while distributing the failure risk across multiple nodes, eliminating the single point of failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Productivity

If PSUs are overloaded during turn-on, then power provisioning fails, but implementing coordination mechanisms increases system complexity and potential failure points

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower provisioning success rateVSAvoidcoordination system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a gating mechanism that deliberately limits power provisioning to only those PSUs that can safely operate under current conditions, rather than attempting to activate all PSUs simultaneously or in sequence. This partial action approach ensures successful power provisioning by being conservative about which PSUs are activated, preventing overload while maintaining adequate power supply through the subset of safely activated units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20260050313A1Distributed coordination of gating on parallel power supplies
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US20260050313A1 patent drawing
  • US20260050313A1 patent drawing
  • US20260050313A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system including controller devices to be associated together by a communication bus and to be associated with multiple power supply units (PSUs) to provide power parallelly to a computer environment is disclosed. The controller devices are to communicate with each other based on at least one of the controller devices winning an arbitration to send at least one packet having a timing indicator through the communication bus to the controller devices. The PSUs provide the power for the computer environment based on the timing indicator.