Parallel Streaming Error Matching for Scalable Quantum Computing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing quantum computing systems face challenges in efficiently tracking and correcting errors due to computational overhead from iterative processing of error detection measurements, which can bottleneck latency and processing rates, especially in noisy environments with increasing numbers of qubits.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a plurality of processing layers is used to section a qubit grid into overlapping sections, with each layer matching detection events near the center of these sections in parallel, followed by a final layer using space-time block algorithms to ensure complete matching, thereby reducing latency and computational overhead.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If iterative processing of error detection measurements is used, then error tracking accuracy is improved, but latency increases and processing rate decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror tracking accuracyVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the qubit grid into multiple sections and processes error detection measurements in parallel across these sections. Each section is handled independently by separate processing units, eliminating the need for sequential iterative processing while maintaining comprehensive error tracking coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from temporal processing (sequential iterative steps) to spatial processing (parallel sections across the qubit grid). By organizing processing units in a spatial arrangement that mirrors the qubit grid structure, the system achieves parallel execution without sacrificing error tracking accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If the number of qubits increases, then quantum computing power is improved, but computational overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantum computing powerVSAvoidcomputational overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the quantum system into manageable sections, each with dedicated processing units. This modular approach allows the system to scale to larger numbers of qubits without proportionally increasing computational overhead, as each section can be processed independently and in parallel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal processing framework where identical processing units can handle multiple sections of the qubit grid. This multi-functional approach reduces the overall computational overhead by reusing the same processing logic across different qubit sections rather than requiring unique processing paths for each qubit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If parallel processing is implemented, then processing rate is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing rateVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the system into discrete, independent sections that can be processed in parallel. Each section is self-contained with its own processing unit, which simplifies the overall system architecture by creating clear boundaries and reducing interdependencies between processing elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent assigns specific processing responsibilities to local processing units that are spatially positioned near their corresponding qubit sections. This local processing approach reduces communication overhead and simplifies data flow management compared to centralized processing, as each unit only needs to handle its local section independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12373724B1Low latency scalable parallel streaming matching for quantum computing systems
Publication Date: 2025.07.29 GOOGLE LLC
  • US12373724B1 patent drawing
  • US12373724B1 patent drawing
  • US12373724B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for tracking errors in a quantum computing system are provided. In one example, a method can include matching data associated with one or more detection events associated with a quantum computing system using a successive pattern structure comprising a plurality of processing layers. Each processing layer in the plurality of processing layers can be associated with a pattern including a plurality of sections. Each section can be associated with a processing unit operable to match one or more detection events near a center of the section. The method can include tracking one or more errors of a quantum computing system based at least in part on a matching of one or more detection events.