Parallel Rating Platforms for Insurance Pricing Specificity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current insurance rating and pricing systems lack flexibility and specificity, particularly for businesses with varying geographical and demographic conditions, leading to inadequate risk assessment and inconsistent premium calculations across different locations.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic automated rating system that uses a communication device to receive business information, identifies applicable coverage based on business type and location, and queries databases to generate precise pricing, incorporating territory factors and professional liability premium values, enabling faster and more accurate quoting of insurance policies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional rating and pricing systems are used, then processing is simpler, but rate and pricing specificity and flexibility are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverate and pricing specificityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the rating and pricing process into multiple parallel platforms: a business owner's policy coverage platform and a professional liability coverage platform. Each platform handles specific coverage types independently, allowing complex pricing calculations to be divided into manageable segments that can be processed simultaneously, thereby improving pricing specificity without overwhelming system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds a temporal dimension by implementing parallel processing architectures where multiple coverage types are rated and priced simultaneously rather than sequentially. This dimensional change allows the system to handle complex multi-platform data processing requirements while maintaining responsiveness and improving pricing specificity through concurrent evaluation of multiple risk factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If comprehensive geographical and demographic data are integrated, then risk assessment improves, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk assessment accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments geographical and demographic data processing into distinct modules within each coverage platform. Territory factors are calculated separately for different geographical regions, and demographic characteristics are processed independently for different business types. This segmentation allows comprehensive data integration while managing processing complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary processing of geographical and demographic data by pre-calculating territory factors and storing them in databases before actual rating operations. This preliminary action reduces the complexity of real-time data processing while maintaining high risk assessment accuracy, as the complex geographical and demographic analysis is completed in advance and reused across multiple pricing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If parallel processing of multiple coverage types is implemented, then quoting speed improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequoting speedVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the insurance coverage into distinct platforms: business owner's policy coverage and professional liability coverage. Each platform operates independently with its own processing logic, allowing parallel execution of rating and pricing calculations for different coverage types. This segmentation enables quoting speed improvement through concurrent processing while managing system complexity through clear platform boundaries and independent operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements universal communication interfaces and data exchange protocols that allow multiple coverage platforms to interact through standardized methods. This multi-functionality enables the system to handle diverse coverage types through a unified architecture, improving quoting speed through parallel processing while controlling system complexity through standardized interaction patterns rather than custom integration for each coverage type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11669910B2Multi-platform data processing system
Publication Date: 2023.06.06 HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO
  • US11669910B2 patent drawing
  • US11669910B2 patent drawing
  • US11669910B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, apparatus, computer program code and means to improve dynamic data processing associated with one or more automated rating applications are provided. In some embodiments, an apparatus may include a communication device to receive a business type and a business location. The apparatus may also include a business owner's policy coverage or standalone general liability coverage platform to query a rating database, the query resulting in at least a first price for an entity. The apparatus may further include a professional liability coverage platform operating in parallel with a business owner's platform.