Parallel Rendering Cores Speculative Display List Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In image forming processes based on PDL, existing techniques are limited by sequential processing of vector rendering commands, which hinders the speed of generating Display Lists and subsequent rendering, as they require receiving a rendering command before proceeding, leading to inefficiencies in the overall image forming process.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a rendering core module with multiple cores that perform data analysis and speculative Display List generation in parallel processing, allowing the second rendering core to generate Display Lists without waiting for a rendering command from the first core, thereby speeding up the image forming process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If sequential processing of vector rendering commands is used, then processing accuracy is maintained, but processing speed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the rendering process into two independent parallel streams: a first rendering core that receives and processes rendering commands sequentially to ensure accuracy, and a second rendering core that speculatively generates Display Lists in parallel without waiting for commands. This segmentation allows the system to maintain processing accuracy in the first core while achieving speed improvement through parallel speculative execution in the second core.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second rendering core performs preliminary speculative generation of Display Lists before actual rendering commands are received. By pre-generating Display Lists speculatively, the system prepares rendering data in advance, reducing waiting time and improving overall processing speed while the first core validates the actual rendering commands to maintain accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If parallel processing with speculative Display List generation is implemented, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage forming efficiencyVSAvoidrendering core module complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rendering core module is segmented into two specialized cores with distinct functions: the first rendering core handles command validation and sequential processing, while the second rendering core handles speculative Display List generation. This functional segmentation improves productivity by enabling parallel processing while managing complexity through clear separation of concerns and defined interfaces between cores.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of time

If multiple rendering cores process data in parallel, then processing time is reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing timeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The second rendering core performs preliminary speculative generation of Display Lists in parallel with the first core's command processing. This preliminary action reduces processing time by preparing rendering data in advance, while system complexity is managed through coordinated execution and validation between the two cores, ensuring that speculative results are verified before final output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the first rendering core validates rendering commands and can correct or reject speculative Display Lists generated by the second core. This feedback loop ensures processing accuracy is maintained despite parallel speculative execution, while the coordinated feedback between cores manages system complexity through defined validation and correction protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3480687B1Image forming apparatus and recording medium
Publication Date: 2021.07.21 KYOCERA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS INC
  • EP3480687B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3480687B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP3480687B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

Provided is an image forming apparatus for further speeding up an image forming process. A first rendering core (117A) of a rendering core module executes data analysis of an object of PDL format printing information. A second rendering core (117B) executes a speculative process for generating a Display List (A to D) for an object (a to d). A third rendering core (117C) executes a rendering process for a printout or display output based on the Display List (A to D) generated by the second rendering core (117B). In addition, data analysis by the first rendering core (117A) and the speculative process by the second rendering core (117B) are executed in parallel processing. As a result, the second rendering core (117B) can execute the generation of a Display List (A to D) by a speculative process even without receiving a rendering command from the first rendering core (117A).