Parallel Counterparty Risk Calculation Method

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for calculating counterparty risk in financial transactions are sequential and time-consuming, making it impractical to perform a higher number of market simulations within a reasonable timeframe.

Innovation Solution

A method for calculating counterparty risk in parallel using a risk calculation application that executes on a computer system, generating and processing multiple market scenarios in parallel, and calculating beta-adjusted portfolio values and exposures based on these scenarios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If sequential counterparty risk calculation is used, then calculation simplicity is maintained, but calculation time is excessive (6-8 hours for 10,000 simulations)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation speedVSAvoidcalculation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the counterparty risk calculation into independent parallel segments: (1) generating multiple market scenarios in parallel using Monte Carlo simulation, (2) calculating portfolio values for each scenario independently, (3) computing exposure metrics separately for each scenario, and (4) aggregating results to derive expected and potential exposures. This segmentation enables simultaneous execution of multiple calculations without sequential dependencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from sequential single-threaded calculation to parallel multi-threaded computation by utilizing multiple processing cores or graphical processing units (GPUs). This dimensional change from one-dimensional sequential processing to multi-dimensional parallel processing dramatically reduces calculation time while maintaining accuracy through independent scenario evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If higher number of market simulations is performed, then risk calculation accuracy is improved, but calculation time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk calculation accuracyVSAvoidcalculation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary parallel generation of market scenarios using log-normal distribution parameters (mean, standard deviation) before exposure calculation. By pre-computing the full set of market scenarios in parallel and storing them, the system eliminates sequential dependencies during the exposure calculation phase, enabling rapid execution of high-number simulations (10,000+) without proportional time increases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates multiple independent copies of the calculation process for different market scenarios, where each scenario is evaluated independently and in parallel. This copying approach allows the system to perform numerous simulations simultaneously using different random seeds and scenario parameters, achieving high statistical accuracy through parallel replication rather than sequential iteration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If parallel processing is implemented, then calculation efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a universal calculation framework that can execute on multiple hardware platforms (CPU, GPU, TPU) without requiring architecture-specific code modifications. The parallel processing logic is designed to be hardware-agnostic, using standardized parallel computation patterns that can be deployed across different system types, thereby reducing the complexity overhead associated with parallel implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250078155A1Method for parallel counterparty risk calculation
Publication Date: 2025.03.06 FMR CORP
  • US20250078155A1 patent drawing
  • US20250078155A1 patent drawing
  • US20250078155A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for calculating counterparty risk using a risk calculation application includes receiving a plurality of transactions in a portfolio, each including a market value and a beta value. The method includes generating, in parallel, a plurality of market scenarios based on a log-normal distribution. The method also includes calculating, in parallel, an average market scenario and a high-risk market scenario based on the plurality of market scenarios. The method further includes calculating, in parallel, a beta-adjusted portfolio value based on the plurality of market values and the plurality of beta values. The method includes calculating, an expected portfolio exposure based on the beta-adjusted portfolio value and the average market scenario. The method also includes calculating a potential portfolio exposure based on the beta-adjusted portfolio value and the high-risk market scenario. The method includes storing the expected portfolio exposure and the potential portfolio exposure in a database.