Parallel-Rope Towing Control for Low-Friction Path Guidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing recreational sports systems using towing ropes suffer from limited user flexibility, high energy consumption due to friction losses, and mechanical complexity, particularly in circular guiding concepts.

Innovation Solution

A rope conveying system with adjustable free rope lengths and a control system that allows for a common anchor point connected kinematically to multiple ropes, enabling flexible movement paths and energy-efficient operation using electric rope winches.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a circular guiding concept is used for the towing rope, then the user can be towed along a predefined path, but the energy consumption increases due to high friction losses and the mechanical complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredefined path guidanceVSAvoidfriction losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the rope from traditional fixed guides and pulleys, eliminating the complex guiding mechanism. Instead, the rope is held by multiple independent tensioning devices that can be controlled separately, removing the source of high friction losses while maintaining path guidance capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical guiding system (guides and pulleys) with an electronically controlled tensioning system. Each rope segment is controlled by independent tensioning devices that can be adjusted via control unit, substituting mechanical guidance with electronic control to reduce friction and complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If a circular guiding concept is used for the towing rope, then the user can be towed along a predefined path, but the device complexity increases due to multiple guides and pulleys

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredefined path guidanceVSAvoidguiding mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the traditional guiding mechanism (guides and pulleys) from the system. Instead of using fixed mechanical guides to define the path, the system uses multiple independently controllable tensioning devices that hold the rope at different positions, eliminating the complex guiding structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The tensioning devices serve multiple functions: they hold the rope, define the movement path, and control the tension in each rope segment. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate guiding mechanisms, reducing overall device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the free rope length is made adjustable for each rope conveying device, then the user flexibility increases, but the control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser flexibilityVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustability of the free rope length for each tensioning device. The control unit can independently adjust the rope length and tension for each device in real-time, allowing the system to adapt to different user needs and movement paths while maintaining manageable control complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Loss of energy

If multiple independently controllable rope conveying devices are used, then the energy efficiency increases by reducing friction losses, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefriction lossesVSAvoidnumber of tensioning devices
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical guiding system with electronically controlled tensioning devices. By using independent tensioning devices that can be controlled via a control unit, the system eliminates high friction losses associated with traditional guides and pulleys, achieving better energy efficiency despite the increased number of components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20260008521A1Rope conveying system, in particular for a recreational sports system
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 KUBINA STEFAN
  • US20260008521A1 patent drawing
  • US20260008521A1 patent drawing
  • US20260008521A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a system (10) in which a user (30) is towed by means of rope forces (46) through a movement region (20) which can be configured by software. The ropes (16) are parallel-kinematically connected at an anchor point (26), via which the user (30) is connected to the recreational sports system (10). By selectively tensioning the individual ropes (16), a controllable resultant tensile force (48) is created in the anchor point (26), which tensile force flexibly tows the user (30) along a movement path (40; 50).