Parallel Subblock Verify for NAND Memory

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current storage devices, particularly in SLC mode, spend a significant portion of programming time on verify operations, which are inefficient due to the need to verify each page individually, limiting the number of pages that can be verified simultaneously and increasing system overhead.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that performs program verify operations on multiple subblocks in parallel, reducing the effective verify time by counting the number of bitlines that do not discharge in response to a verify read pulse, allowing for a probabilistic approach to verify operations without compromising quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If verify operations are performed on each page individually to ensure programming quality, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to the sequential nature of verification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverify accuracyVSAvoidprogramming speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The memory device is divided into multiple subblocks, each with its own verify circuitry. This segmentation allows parallel verification of multiple subblocks simultaneously, transforming the sequential verify process into a parallel one, thereby improving programming speed while maintaining verification accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple verify operations that were previously performed sequentially on different pages are merged into a single simultaneous verify operation across multiple subblocks. The verify circuitry combines the verification of multiple subblocks in parallel, achieving both high productivity and measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Productivity

If the number of pages verified simultaneously is increased to improve programming speed, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional verify circuitry requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogramming speedVSAvoidverify circuitry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The verify circuitry is segmented into multiple independent verify units, each responsible for a specific subblock. This modular segmentation allows the system to scale verification capacity by adding more simple units rather than complicating a single verify circuit, improving productivity while managing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each verify circuit unit is designed to be universal and can verify any subblock independently. This multi-functionality allows the same verify circuit design to be replicated across multiple subblocks, achieving parallel verification capability without proportionally increasing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If calibration is increased to maintain 100% non-sampling single loop for SLC programming, then reliability is improved, but loss of time increases due to extended verify operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogramming reliabilityVSAvoidverify time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the verification process across multiple subblocks that operate in parallel, the total verify time is reduced while maintaining the same calibration standards. Each subblock is verified independently and simultaneously, preserving reliability without the time penalty of sequential verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The parallel verify operation allows multiple subblocks to be verified continuously and simultaneously rather than sequentially. This continuous parallel action maintains high calibration standards and reliability while eliminating the time loss associated with sequential verify operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves SLC programming time by approximately 30% without compromising quality, allowing for faster programming while maintaining reliable status reporting.

Implementation Method 1

counting a number of bitlines of the multiple subblocks that do not discharge in response to the verify read pulse

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBitline discharge detection: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentUS20240136002A1Simultaneous statistical multi-subblock verify for NAND memories
Publication Date: 2024.04.25 INTEL NDTM US LLC
  • US20240136002A1 patent drawing
  • US20240136002A1 patent drawing
  • US20240136002A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Program verify can be performed simultaneously on multiple subblocks in a storage device. The program verify occurs after a program operation of the storage cells. The program verify can include application of a verify read pulse to multiple subblocks simultaneously and then a count a number of bitlines of the multiple subblocks that do not discharge in response to the verify read pulse. The program verify passes if the count is within an expected range, instead of requiring all storage cells to pass program verify before moving on. If the number of bitlines not discharging is outside the expected range, the system can perform a second program pass.