Parallel-Motion Trackpad for Uniform Click Force Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional trackpads often lack intuitive and comfortable feedback mechanisms, especially in portable devices where mechanical buttons are undesirable due to space constraints, and 'diving board' designs have inconsistent click forces across the surface, detracting from user experience.

Innovation Solution

A trackpad design featuring a touch plate with a support mechanism that translates vertically without rotation, using a pivotable mechanism with rotatable wings to ensure equal downward force requirements and parallel motion across the surface, accompanied by a switch for tactile feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a diving board design is used for the trackpad, then the structure is simple and space-efficient, but the click force becomes inconsistent across the surface

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrackpad structureVSAvoidclick force consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The support mechanism is divided into multiple independent arms (first arm, second arm, third arm) that are pivotally connected to the touch plate at different locations. Each arm independently supports a portion of the touch plate, allowing the system to achieve uniform click force across the surface while maintaining structural simplicity. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by distributing the support function across multiple simple components rather than requiring a complex monolithic structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple support arms with a common pivotal connection point to the substrate, merging their functions into a unified support system. This merging allows the trackpad to maintain parallel motion during actuation while using simple, space-efficient arm structures. The combined system achieves consistent click force across the surface without requiring each individual arm to be complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of operation

If mechanical buttons are used for input, then tactile feedback is intuitive and comfortable, but space is consumed and mechanical components increase complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetactile feedbackVSAvoidmechanical components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical buttons with a capacitive touch sensor system that detects finger contact through electrical field changes. This substitution eliminates the need for separate mechanical button components while maintaining tactile feedback through the actuation of the touch plate. The touch sensor integrated into the touch plate provides button-like functionality without the space and complexity of dedicated mechanical buttons.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The touch plate serves multiple functions: it acts as both the input surface for gesture recognition and as the actuator that provides tactile feedback when pressed. The same structural component (touch plate) that enables gesture input also provides the mechanical feedback sensation, eliminating the need for separate button mechanisms. This multi-functionality reduces overall device complexity while maintaining intuitive tactile feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If the touch plate is allowed to rotate during actuation, then the support mechanism can be simpler, but the click force distribution becomes uneven across the surface

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport mechanismVSAvoidclick force uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The support mechanism is designed to dynamically adapt to the location of applied force on the touch plate. When force is applied at any location, the pivotable arms automatically adjust their angles and positions to maintain parallel motion of the touch plate. This dynamic adjustment ensures uniform click force distribution across the entire surface while keeping the mechanism itself relatively simple, as no complex pre-adjustment or calibration is required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the support mechanism (arm lengths, pivot points, connection locations) to achieve parallel motion during actuation. By carefully selecting these parameters, the system ensures that the touch plate moves uniformly without rotation regardless of where it is pressed. This parameter optimization allows the mechanism to maintain simplicity while achieving precise force distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides consistent tactile feedback and equal click force across the trackpad surface, enhancing user experience and comfort by maintaining parallel motion and reducing power and cost requirements.

Implementation Method 1

a switch to transduce movement of the touch plate along the central axis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTransduction:

Implementation Method 2

a touch sensor to detect a user touch on the top surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitive sensing: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS12578768B2Parallel motion trackpad
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 APPLE INC
  • US12578768B2 patent drawing
  • US12578768B2 patent drawing
  • US12578768B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An input device includes a touch plate having a central axis and a top surface with three outer points evenly spaced away from the central axis. A touch sensor is used to detect a user touch on the top surface at the first outer point, and a support mechanism supports the touch plate and is configured to translate the touch plate at the second and third outer points upon application of the user touch and translation of the touch plate at the first outer point. Translation of the three outer points is substantially equal along the central axis.