Parallel Trigger Model for Test Instruments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current test and measurement instruments perform trigger processes sequentially, leading to inefficiencies and prolonged testing times due to the inability to trigger multiple functional components in parallel.

Innovation Solution

A test and measurement instrument equipped with a parallel trigger model that allows multiple functions to be performed simultaneously by coordinating operations through a processor, enabling independent or synchronized execution of functions, thereby increasing efficiency and reducing testing time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If sequential triggering is used to coordinate multiple functional components, then device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is maintained, but productivity decreases and loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting speedVSAvoidtrigger model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The trigger model is segmented into multiple independent trigger processes (first trigger process, second trigger process, etc.), each capable of controlling different functional components simultaneously. This segmentation allows parallel execution of triggering operations without increasing overall system complexity, as each segment operates independently but coordinates through the shared bus.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a single-dimensional sequential trigger model to a multi-dimensional parallel trigger model by introducing multiple trigger processes that can execute simultaneously. This dimensional change enables time-parallelism where multiple functions are triggered across different time dimensions rather than strictly sequentially.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Loss of time

If sequential triggering is used for multiple functions, then ease of operation is maintained, but loss of time increases due to waiting for each function to complete

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting timeVSAvoidtrigger process simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple trigger processes are preliminarily configured and prepared in advance, allowing them to execute simultaneously when triggered. The first trigger process can initiate a switching operation while the second trigger process simultaneously initiates a measurement operation, eliminating the need to wait for one function to complete before starting the next.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The parallel trigger model ensures continuous useful action by allowing multiple functional components to be triggered and executed simultaneously rather than sequentially. This continuity eliminates idle waiting time between operations, as the system maintains active triggering across multiple functions at the same time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Productivity

If parallel triggering is implemented to perform multiple functions simultaneously, then productivity increases and loss of time decreases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting efficiencyVSAvoidtrigger model structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The trigger model is designed with universal multi-functionality, where a single parallel trigger framework can simultaneously control multiple different functional components (switching, measurement, data logging, etc.). This universal approach avoids the need for separate dedicated trigger mechanisms for each function, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity while enabling parallel operation of diverse components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If parallel triggering is used to coordinate multiple functional components, then productivity increases, but device complexity increases due to coordination requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting throughputVSAvoidcoordination mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A shared bus acts as an intermediary mechanism that coordinates communication between multiple trigger processes and functional components. This intermediary allows parallel triggering operations to exchange information and synchronize their execution without requiring complex direct point-to-point coordination between each trigger process and component, thereby managing complexity through a centralized communication interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11061077B2Parallel trigger model for test and measurement instruments
Publication Date: 2021.07.13 KEITHLEY INSTRUMENTS LLC
  • US11061077B2 patent drawing
  • US11061077B2 patent drawing
  • US11061077B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A test and measurement instrument for performing multiple operations, including a port to receive a signal from a device under test; and a processor. The processor configured to, based on a parallel trigger model, execute a first process associated with first functionality of the test and measurement instrument, and execute a second process on the signal from the device under test, the second process associated with second functionality of the test and measurement instrument. The second process commencing prior to completion of the first process.