Parallel Tube Inspection System Using Segmented Probes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Chemical processing plants face challenges in efficiently inspecting tubing for corrosion, as traditional methods require extended shutdowns, are costly, and pose safety risks due to the difficulty in controlling corrosion rates within reactors, boilers, and pressure vessels.

Innovation Solution

A high-speed tube inspection system that uses electromagnetic testing (ET) in conjunction with other methods like Penetrant Testing (PT) and Ultrasonic Testing (UT), allowing for simultaneous inspection of multiple tubes with real-time data analysis, using a motor-driven system with multiple probes to reduce inspection time and increase productivity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional tube inspection methods are used, then inspection thoroughness is maintained, but inspection time and plant downtime increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection speedVSAvoidplant downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection system divides the inspection task into multiple independent probe units, each capable of inspecting individual tubes simultaneously. The apparatus includes multiple probes (e.g., 16 probes) that can be deployed in parallel to inspect multiple tubes at the same time, thereby dramatically reducing total inspection time while maintaining thoroughness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines multiple inspection functions into a single integrated apparatus. Multiple probes, reels, and control systems are merged into one coordinated unit that can inspect multiple tubes simultaneously, reducing the need for multiple separate inspection operations and minimizing plant downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Productivity

If multiple probes are used to inspect multiple tubes simultaneously, then inspection productivity increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection throughputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection apparatus is designed as a universal system that can inspect multiple tubes of varying sizes and configurations. The probes and reels are configured to accommodate different tube diameters and arrangements, allowing the same apparatus to handle diverse inspection scenarios without requiring multiple specialized devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses intermediate components such as reels and cables to manage the complexity of controlling multiple probes. The reels act as mediators between the control system and the probes, providing mechanical coordination and simplifying the control architecture by centralizing the deployment and retraction mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of time

If manual inspection methods are used, then equipment cost is reduced, but inspection time and labor requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection durationVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection system is designed to be self-contained and self-operating to the extent possible. The apparatus includes integrated power supplies, control systems, and data processing capabilities that allow it to perform inspections autonomously without requiring extensive manual intervention, thereby reducing labor costs while maintaining high inspection speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses electromagnetic testing parameters and signal processing techniques to achieve rapid defect detection. By optimizing the electromagnetic frequency, probe configuration, and data analysis algorithms, the system achieves high-speed inspection without requiring proportionally higher hardware costs, balancing performance with affordability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces inspection time, minimizes plant downtime, enhances defect detection and remediation, improves compliance with regulations, predicts remaining tube life, and increases production runs while reducing tubular failures.

Implementation Method 1

the probes are lowered simultaneously into a different tube within the vessel... The probes may perform ET while be lowered and/or raised

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic testing: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS11150218B2Parallel tube inspection system
Publication Date: 2021.10.19 AMERAPEX NDT LLC
  • US11150218B2 patent drawing
  • US11150218B2 patent drawing
  • US11150218B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system, apparatus, and method of quickly inspecting tubes of chemical plants is provided, where one or more tube inspection apparatuses are used to simultaneously perform electromagnetic testing (“ET”) of multiple tubes of a chemical plant by simultaneously lowering probes into separate tubes and transmitting the data to a processor. In some embodiments, the data from the probes can be transmitted in real or near-real time to a remote processor for analysis to determine whether any defects exist in the tubes and the extent of such defects.