Parallel Valving Elements for Pressure Differential Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing valve systems in hydronic heat transfer systems face challenges in efficiently regulating pressure differentials across loads, often requiring large, complex valves that are costly and difficult to manufacture, and may not effectively maintain desired pressure differentials due to varying fluid flow rates.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing multiple valving elements in parallel, each with a common driving pressure source, that selectively opens or closes to regulate fluid flow between an inlet and outlet, allowing for precise control of pressure differentials by comparing detected pressure differences to a set point and adjusting accordingly, with the ability to easily machine and scale up valve size.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If a single large valving element is used to regulate pressure differentials, then the valve can provide sufficient flow capacity, but the valve becomes difficult to machine and manufacture

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow capacityVSAvoidmachining difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides a single large valve into multiple smaller valving elements (first, second, and third valving elements) that operate in parallel. Each smaller element is easier to machine and manufacture individually, while collectively they provide the required flow capacity. The valving elements are positioned at different radial locations in the conduit, allowing independent fabrication and assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If a single large valving element is used, then flow capacity is sufficient, but the stroke length becomes excessively long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow capacityVSAvoidstroke length
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the valve into multiple smaller elements distributed around the conduit perimeter, each element requires a shorter stroke to achieve the necessary flow modulation. The parallel arrangement allows the system to achieve equivalent flow control with reduced individual stroke lengths compared to a single large valve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a single-dimensional large valve to a multi-dimensional arrangement of smaller valves distributed around the conduit circumference. This spatial distribution in multiple dimensions allows reduced stroke length while maintaining overall flow capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of manufacture

If multiple valving elements are used in parallel, then manufacturing cost and machining ease improve, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidvalve system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple independent valving elements into a unified system controlled by a single actuator. The actuator simultaneously controls all valving elements through mechanical linkage, merging the control function and reducing operational complexity despite the increased number of components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The actuator serves multiple functions by simultaneously controlling all valving elements. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate actuators for each valve element, thereby reducing overall system complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If existing valve systems are used, then pressure differential regulation is attempted, but the systems fail to effectively maintain desired pressure differentials due to varying fluid flow rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure differential maintenanceVSAvoidresponse to varying flow rates
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent positions valving elements at different radial locations within the conduit, allowing each element to respond to local flow conditions. This local positioning enables better adaptation to varying fluid flow rates and more effective maintenance of desired pressure differentials across different operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables efficient regulation of pressure differentials with reduced stroke requirements, lower manufacturing costs, and easier machining, allowing for larger valve sizing with multiple smaller elements that collectively function like a single larger valve, thereby improving flow control and maintaining desired pressure differentials effectively.

Implementation Method 1

The valve activation system is configured to supply a common driving pressure to the plurality of valving elements. The common driving pressure is configured to initiate at least one of the opening or closing of the plurality of valving elements or to initiate the other of the opening or closing of the plurality of valving elements.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS9442493B2System for regulating pressure differentials on a fluid
Publication Date: 2016.09.13 TOUR & ANDERSSON AB
  • US9442493B2 patent drawing
  • US9442493B2 patent drawing
  • US9442493B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an embodiment of the disclosure, a system for regulating a pressure differential includes a plurality of valving elements and a valve activation system. Each of the plurality of valving elements are configured to selectively allow and restrict at least a portion of a flow of fluid between an inlet and an outlet of a conduit through a respective opening and closing of each respective valving element. The valve activation system is configured to supply a common driving pressure to the plurality of valving elements. The common driving pressure is configured to initiate at least one of the opening or closing of the plurality of valving elements or to initiate the other of the opening or closing of the plurality of valving elements.