Parameter Search Automation Efficiency via Bayesian Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional multi-task Bayesian optimization methods are inefficient when the correlation between target and reference observation data is low, leading to incorrect model estimation and reduced parameter search efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A parameter-searching method that estimates the posterior distribution of a model function by correcting for the variation between target and reference observation data within the parameter space, using methods such as shift estimation to improve correlation and accuracy, allowing for efficient parameter value determination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If conventional multi-task Bayesian optimization is used to search for optimal parameters, then the parameter search can be automated, but the search efficiency deteriorates when correlation between target and reference observation data is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter search automationVSAvoidparameter search efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a correlation coefficient calculation as an intermediary step to assess the relationship between target and reference observation data. When the correlation coefficient falls below a threshold, the system switches to single-task Bayesian optimization instead of forcing multi-task optimization, thereby avoiding inefficient searches while maintaining automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the optimization approach based on the calculated correlation coefficient. The system transitions between multi-task and single-task Bayesian optimization modes depending on the data correlation level, optimizing search efficiency adaptively rather than using a fixed approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If multi-task Bayesian optimization is applied, then parameter search can leverage reference data, but model estimation accuracy deteriorates when data correlation is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to use reference dataVSAvoidmodel estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The correlation coefficient serves as an intermediary indicator to evaluate whether reference observation data should be used for model estimation. By calculating this coefficient first, the system determines the appropriateness of leveraging reference data, ensuring accuracy is maintained while preserving adaptability to use available data when appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If parameter search is performed with many measurement repetitions, then optimal parameter value can be found with higher confidence, but time consumption and sample consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfidence in optimal parameter valueVSAvoidmeasurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback through correlation coefficient calculation to guide the parameter search process. By assessing data correlation before initiating optimization, the system avoids unnecessary repeated measurements that would consume time and samples, while still achieving reliable optimal parameter identification through the appropriate optimization method selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12106233B2Parameter-searching method, parameter-searching device, and program for parameter search
Publication Date: 2024.10.01 SHIMADZU CORP
  • US12106233B2 patent drawing
  • US12106233B2 patent drawing
  • US12106233B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A model estimator (11) estimates a model function of an analyzing system (20) based on target observation data and reference observation data. For this estimation, the amount of variation between the model of the target system and that of a reference model is estimated from the target observation data and reference observation data. The model function of the target model is estimated after the observation data are corrected based on the estimated amount of variation. A parameter determiner (12) calculates an acquisition function based on the mean and covariance of the model function, and determines a parameter value for the next observation, using the acquisition function. A data acquirer (13) sets the parameter value in the analyzing system (20) and acquires a corresponding observed value. A loop process with the feedback of the observation data is repeated to determine an optimal parameter value. In the case of a parameter search using a multi-task Bayesian optimization method, the present technique improves the efficiency of the parameter search even if the correlation between the target observation data and reference observation data is low.